A stochastic AHP decision making methodology for imprecise preferences

Abstract Existing decision making methodologies like the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) address imprecise pairwise comparisons by modeling crisp pairwise comparisons as fuzzy sets or a single type of probability distribution (e.g., uniform, triangular). However, one common issue faced by decision makers (DMs) is bounded rationality. That is, DMs have limited cognitive powers in specifying their preferences over multiple pairwise comparisons. This result to crisp as well as imprecise pairwise comparisons. Furthermore, given the ultimate goal of imprecise AHP is to make the decision, computing weights for the criteria and the alternatives from the imprecise preferences is a must. Hence, these various types of pairwise comparisons must be modeled using a single probability distribution for easy computation of the weights. In this research, a beta distribution is proposed to model the varying stochastic preferences of the DM. The method-of-moments methodology is used to fit the varying stochastic preferences of the DM into beta stochastic pairwise comparisons since it can represent a wide variety of probability distributions. Additionally, a non-linear programming model is then developed that calculates weights which maximize the preferences of the DM while maintaining a level of consistency. Comparison experiments are conducted using datasets collected from literature to validate the proposed methodology.

[1]  Jyh-Rong Chou,et al.  A linguistic evaluation approach for universal design , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[3]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  R. Beckman,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation for the beta distribution , 1978 .

[5]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  On lexicographic goal programming method for generating weights from inconsistent interval comparison matrices , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  Yao Chen,et al.  A fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process based approach to the process of railway risk information: A railway risk management system , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Xiao-Jun Yang,et al.  How to handle uncertainties in AHP: The Cloud Delphi hierarchical analysis , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[8]  He-Yau Kang,et al.  Fuzzy multiple goal programming applied to TFT-LCD supplier selection by downstream manufacturers , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  J. Antony,et al.  Modified analytic hierarchy process to incorporate uncertainty and managerial aspects , 2004 .

[10]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios , 1984 .

[11]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Solving multi-period project selection problems with fuzzy goal programming based on TOPSIS and a fuzzy preference relation , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[13]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  A. Stam,et al.  Stochastic Judgments in the AHP: The Measurement of Rank Reversal Probabilities , 1997 .

[15]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Application of stochastic analytic hierarchy process within a domestic appliance manufacturer , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  An eigenvector method for generating normalized interval and fuzzy weights , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[17]  Linda M. Haines,et al.  A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgements. (I). Distributions on feasible regions , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  A probabilistic study of preference structures in the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments , 1993 .

[19]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  David Johnson,et al.  The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis , 1997 .

[21]  Yueh-Hsiang Chen,et al.  Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[22]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .

[23]  Wen-Chin Chen,et al.  A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A min-max Goal Programming Approach to Priority Derivation in AHP with Interval Judgements , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[25]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Multicriteria decision-making based on goal programming and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: An application to capital budgeting problem , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Noel Bryson,et al.  A Goal Programming Method for Generating Priority Vectors , 1995 .

[29]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[30]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: Models, Methods and Applications , 2010 .

[31]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Consensus Building in AHP-Group Decision Making: A Bayesian Approach , 2010, Oper. Res..

[32]  Moshe Kress,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation — a comment , 1991 .

[33]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Fang Liu,et al.  A new method of obtaining the priority weights from an interval fuzzy preference relation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Stan Lipovetsky,et al.  Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Wenjun Chris Zhang,et al.  A novel approach to probability distribution aggregation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[37]  Paul T. Boggs,et al.  Sequential Quadratic Programming , 1995, Acta Numerica.

[38]  Ami Arbel,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation , 1989 .

[39]  T. Saaty Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2005 .

[40]  Metin Dağdeviren,et al.  Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Raffaello Seri,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Theory of Measurement , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Peijun Guo,et al.  Decision-making with interval probabilities , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[43]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  A Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Z. S. Xu,et al.  Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation , 2004, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[46]  M. P. Biswal,et al.  Preference programming and inconsistent interval judgments , 1997 .

[47]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[48]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[49]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Goal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relations , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[50]  Eugene D. Hahn Decision Making with Uncertain Judgments: A Stochastic Formulation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[51]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  Selecting the Individual Numerical Scale and Prioritization Method in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Approach , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[52]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[53]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[54]  Peijun Guo,et al.  Eliciting dual interval probabilities from interval comparison matrices , 2012, Inf. Sci..