An interactive computer-based interface to support the discovery of individuals' mental representations and preferences in decisions problems: An application to travel behavior

Growing emphasis is currently given in decision modeling on process data to capture behavioral mechanisms that ground decision-making processes. Nevertheless, advanced applications to elicit such data are still lacking. The Causal Network Elicitation Technique interview and card-game, both face-to-face interviews, are examples of a behavioral process method to obtain individuals' decision-making by eliciting temporary mental representations of particular problems. However, to portray and model these representations into formal modeling approaches, such as Bayesian decision networks, an extensive set of parameters has to be gathered for each individual. Thus, data collection procedures for large sample groups can be costly and time consuming. This paper reports on the methodological conversion and enhancement of the existing elicitation methods into a computer-based interface that allows to not only uncover individuals' mental representations but also to automate the generation of preference parameter elicitation questions. Results of such studies can be used to understand individuals' constructs and beliefs with respect to decision alternatives, predict individuals' decision behavior at a disaggregate level, and to assess behavioral changes due to differences in contexts and constraints.

[1]  Mark Bradley,et al.  Process Data for Understanding and Modelling Travel Behaviour , 2006 .

[2]  J. Barber Computer-assisted drug prevention. , 1990, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[3]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The influence of learner-generated domain representations on learning combinatorics and probability theory , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  O. Svenson,et al.  Decision making : cognitive models and explanations , 1997 .

[5]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Introduction: Habitual travel choice , 2003 .

[6]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Travel survey methods : quality and future directions , 2006 .

[7]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Scrutinizing individuals’ leisure-shopping travel decisions to appraise activity-based models of travel demand , 2010 .

[8]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[10]  S L Hammar,et al.  Computer-assisted detection and intervention in adolescent high-risk health behaviors. , 1990, The Journal of pediatrics.

[11]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[12]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Habitual travel behaviour: Evidence from a six-week travel diary , 2003 .

[13]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[14]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[15]  T. Garling Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling , 1998 .

[16]  Stacey Bricka,et al.  Collection and Analysis of Behavioural Process Data: Challenges and Opportunities , 2006 .

[17]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Learning Bayesian networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[18]  P S Gibbons,et al.  Enabling the diagnosis of occult psychiatric illness in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial of the computerized, self-administered PRIME-MD diagnostic system. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  Hermina J. M. Tabachneck-Schijf,et al.  CaMeRa: A Computational Model of Multiple Representations , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[21]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Toward a Methodology for the Measurement of Knowledge Structures of Ordinary People , 1997 .

[22]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Principles of mental representation , 2007 .

[23]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  A Conceptual Analysis of the Impact of Travel Demand Management on Private Car Use , 2002 .

[24]  P. Koele,et al.  Psychometric and methodological aspects of process tracing research. , 1997 .

[25]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[26]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Mental maps and travel behaviour: meanings and models , 2012, J. Geogr. Syst..

[27]  Gerald E. Larson,et al.  Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2004, Computer science and data analysis series.

[29]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications , 2000 .

[30]  R. Cox Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences , 1999 .

[31]  Galina Velikova,et al.  Computer-assisted questionnaires may facilitate collection of quality-of-life (QOL) data: At a cost , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Bernhard Weber,et al.  Acceptance of computerized compared to paper-and-pencil assessment in psychiatric inpatients , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[34]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Theoretical foundations for travel choice modeling , 1998 .

[35]  T. Arentze,et al.  Modeling and Measuring Individuals' Mental Representations of Complex Spatio-Temporal Decision Problems , 2008 .

[36]  Eliahu Stern,et al.  Behavioural modelling of road users: current research and future needs , 2005 .

[37]  M. Cowles,et al.  Automated Psychological Testing: Method of Administration, Need for Approval, and Measures of Anxiety , 1989 .

[38]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for experimenters : an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building , 1979 .

[39]  V. Mahajan,et al.  New product models: Practice, shortcomings and desired improvements , 1992 .

[40]  K. Grunert,et al.  Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: Theoretical considerations and methodological problems , 1995 .

[41]  Karen A. F. Copeland Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Ed. , 2001 .

[42]  Martine B. Powell,et al.  The effects of a computerised interview on children's recall of an event , 1999 .

[43]  Catherine Georgina Russell,et al.  A comparison of three laddering techniques applied to an example of a complex food choice , 2004 .

[44]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Transport Survey Quality and Innovation , 2003 .

[45]  Paul Rosenfeld,et al.  Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference? , 1992 .

[46]  William L. Moore,et al.  A Comparison of Conjoint Methods When There Are Many Attributes , 1999 .

[47]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Principles of mental representation , 1996 .

[48]  Harry J. P. Timmermans,et al.  Shopping Context and Consumers' Mental Representation of Complex Shopping Trip Decision Problems , 2008 .

[49]  G. Wets,et al.  Destination Choice in Daily Activity Travel , 2008 .

[50]  E. Miller,et al.  A computerized household activity scheduling survey , 2000 .