Anthropomorphic language in online forums about Roomba, AIBO and the iPad

What encourages people to refer to a robot as if it was a living being? Is it because of the robot's humanoid or animal-like shape, its movements or rather the kind of interaction it enables? We aim to investigate robots' characteristics that lead people to anthropomorphize it by comparing different kinds of robotic devices and contrasting it to an interactive technology. We addressed this question by comparing anthropomorphic language in online forums about the Roomba robotic vacuum cleaner, the AIBO robotic dog, and the iPad tablet computer. A content analysis of 750 postings was carried out. We expected to find the highest amount of anthropomorphism in the AIBO forum but were not sure about how far people referred to Roomba or the iPad as a lifelike artifact. Findings suggest that people anthropomorphize their robotic dog significantly more than their Roomba or iPad, across different topics of forum posts. Further, the topic of the post had a significant impact on anthropomorphic language.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[2]  Kate S. Hone,et al.  E-motional advantage: performance and satisfaction gains with affective computing , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  Peter Robinson,et al.  How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.

[6]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[8]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[10]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[13]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[14]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Mental models of robotic assistants , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  L. Caporael.  Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism: two faces of the human machine , 1986 .

[16]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Cooperation with a robotic assistant , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  Claudia Wagner,et al.  Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[18]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Human Mental Models of Humanoid Robots , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.