Highway agencies across the nation are moving towards implementation of the new AASHTO Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) for pavement design. The objective of this project was to implement the MEPDG into the daily operations of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). The implementation of the MEPDG as a UDOT standard required modifications in some UDOT pavement design protocols (i.e., lab testing procedures, equipment, and protocols, traffic data reporting, software issues, design output interpretation, and others). A key requirement is validation of the MEPDG’s nationally calibrated pavement distress and smoothness prediction models when applied under Utah conditions and performing local calibration if needed. This was accomplished using data from Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) projects located in Utah and UDOT pavement management system (PMS) pavement sections. The nationally calibrated MEPDG models were evaluated. With the exception of the new hot-mix asphalt (HMA) pavement total rutting model, all other models were found to be reasonable. The rutting model was locally calibrated to increase goodness of fit and remove significant bias. Due to the nature of the data used in model validation, it is recommended that further MEPDG model validation be accomplished in the future using a database that contains HMA pavement and jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) exhibiting moderate to severe deterioration. This report represents Phase II of the UDOT MEPDG implementation study and builds on the Phase I study report completed in 2005 for UDOT. The Draft User’s Guide for UDOT Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design (UDOT Research Report No. UT-09.11a, dated October 2009) incorporates the findings of this report as inputs and pavement design guidelines for Utah for use by UDOT’s pavement design engineers during trial implementation of the MEPDG.
[1]
W O Hadley,et al.
PACIFIC RIM TRANSTECH CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS. VOLUME II. CHANGES TO THE AASHTO GUIDE FOR DESIGN OF PAVEMENT STRUCTURES
,
1993
.
[2]
John D. Horel,et al.
Application of Road Weather Information Systems in the western United States
,
2001
.
[3]
Grant G Schultz,et al.
Utah Commercial Motor Vehicle Weigh-in-Motion Data Analysis and Calibration Methodology
,
2006
.
[4]
Jagannath Mallela,et al.
Changes to the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide software through version 09.00, July 2006
,
2006
.
[5]
Harold L Von Quintus,et al.
Draft User's Guide for UDOT Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design
,
2009
.
[6]
Mitsuru Saito,et al.
Evaluating the Accuracy Level of Truck Traffic Data on State Highways
,
2009
.