Recognizing skill networks and their specific communication and connection practices

Social networks are a popular medium for building and maintaining a professional network. Many studies exist on general communication and connection practices within these networks. However, studies on expertise search suggest the existence of subgroups centered around a particular profession. In this paper, we analyze commonalities and differences between these groups, based on a set of 94,155 public user profiles. The results confirm that such subgroups can be recognized. Further, the average number of connections differs between groups, as a result of differences in intention for using social media. Similarly, within the groups, specific topics and resources are discussed and shared, and there are interesting differences in the tone and wording the group members use. These insights are relevant for interpreting results from social media analyses and can be used for identifying group-specific resources and communication practices that new members may want to know about.

[1]  Yiming Yang,et al.  A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization , 1997, ICML.

[2]  Craig MacDonald,et al.  High Quality Expertise Evidence for Expert Search , 2008, ECIR.

[3]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Language Matters In Twitter: A Large Scale Study , 2011, ICWSM.

[4]  Andrea Esuli,et al.  SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining , 2006, LREC.

[5]  Eelco Herder,et al.  Extraction of Professional Interests from Social Web Profiles , 2011 .

[6]  F. Cingano,et al.  People I Know: Job Search and Social Networks , 2008, Journal of Labor Economics.

[7]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Analyzing, Detecting, and Exploiting Sentiment in Web Queries , 2013, TWEB.

[8]  Maarten de Rijke,et al.  Finding experts and their eetails in e-mail corpora , 2006, WWW '06.

[9]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Cognos: crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[10]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Expert-Finding Systems for Organizations: Problem and Domain Analysis and the DEMOIR Approach , 2003, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[11]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[12]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Fan Zhang,et al.  What's in a name?: an unsupervised approach to link users across communities , 2013, WSDM.

[14]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  How useful are your comments?: analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings , 2010, WWW '10.

[15]  David Carmel,et al.  Mining expertise and interests from social media , 2013, WWW.

[16]  Geert-Jan Houben,et al.  Cross-system user modeling and personalization on the Social Web , 2013, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[17]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.