Phase Transitions In A Social Impact Model For Opinion Formation

A model for opinion formation in a social group, based on the Theory of Social Impact developed by Latane, is studied by means of numerical simulations. Interactions among the members of the group, as well as with a strong leader competing with the mass media, are considered. The model exhibits first-order transitions between two different states of opinion, which are supported by the leader and the mass media, respectively. The social inertia of the group becomes evident when the opinion of the leader changes periodically. In this case two dynamic states are identified: for long periods of time, the group follows the changes of the leader but, decreasing the period, the opinion of the group remains unchanged. This scenery is suitable for the ocurrence of dynamic phase transitions.

[1]  J. Indekeu.  Special attention network , 2003, physics/0310113.

[2]  Marsili,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence , 2000, Physical review letters.

[3]  W. Weidlich,et al.  Concepts and Models of a Quantitative Sociology , 1983 .

[4]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Role of dimensionality in Axelrod's model for the dissemination of culture , 2003 .

[5]  Clelia M. Bordogna,et al.  Simulation of social processes: application to social learning , 2003 .

[6]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Phase transitions in social impact models of opinion formation , 2000 .

[7]  Serge Galam,et al.  The dynamics of minority opinions in democratic debate , 2004 .

[8]  B. Latané,et al.  Statistical mechanics of social impact. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  Jean-Daniel Zucker,et al.  From Individual Choice to Group Decision Making , 2000 .

[10]  J. Hołyst,et al.  Phase transitions as a persistent feature of groups with leaders in models of opinion formation , 2000 .

[11]  Philip Ball,et al.  The physical modelling of society: a historical perspective , 2002 .

[12]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[13]  P. A. Rikvold,et al.  Kinetic Ising Model in an Oscillating Field: Finite-Size Scaling at the Dynamic Phase Transition , 1998 .

[14]  E V Albano,et al.  Theoretical description of teaching-learning processes: a multidisciplinary approach. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[15]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active Brownian particles , 1999, adap-org/9911005.

[16]  Santo Fortunato.  Damage spreading and opinion dynamics on scale-free networks , 2005 .

[17]  G Korniss,et al.  Dynamic phase transition, universality, and finite-size scaling in the two-dimensional kinetic Ising model in an oscillating field. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  D. Zanette,et al.  Stochastic resonance in a model of opinion formation on small-world networks , 2001, cond-mat/0111289.

[19]  Clelia M. Bordogna,et al.  PHASE TRANSITIONS IN A MODEL FOR SOCIAL LEARNING VIA THE INTERNET , 2001 .

[20]  S. Galam.  Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: “the hung elections scenario” , 2003, cond-mat/0307404.

[21]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  Simulation of Galam's contrarian opinions on percolative lattices , 2004 .

[22]  A Díaz-Guilera,et al.  Modeling diffusion of innovations in a social network. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.