Precision study of DXA‐based patient‐specific finite element modeling for assessing hip fracture risk

Finite element (FE) modeling based on a patient's hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) image is a promising tool for more accurately assessing hip fracture risk, as it is able to comprehensively consider effects from all the mechanical parameters affecting hip fracture. However, a number of factors influence the precision (also known as repeatability or reproducibility) of a DXA-based FE procedure, for example, subject positioning in DXA scanning. As a procedure is required to have adequately high precision in clinical application, we investigated the effects of the involved factors on the precision of a DXA-based patient-specific FE procedure developed by the authors, to provide insight into how the precision of the procedure can be improved so that it can meet the clinical standards. Fracture risk indices corresponding to initial and repeat DXA scans acquired in 30 typical clinical subjects were computed and compared to assess short term repeatability of the procedure. It was found that inconsistent positioning followed by manual segmentation of the projected femur contour induced significant variability in the predicted fracture risk indices. This research suggests that, to apply the DXA-based FE procedure in clinical assessment, it will be necessary to pay more strict attention to subject positioning in DXA scanning.

[1]  S. Cummings,et al.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  L. Melton,et al.  A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. , 2008, Bone.

[3]  E. Fisher,et al.  Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  A. Papaioannou,et al.  Lengthy Hospitalization Associated with Vertebral Fractures Despite Control for Comorbid Conditions , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[5]  C. Ruff,et al.  Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  A. Cappello,et al.  Risk of fracture in elderly patients: a new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis. , 1999, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[7]  Yunhua Luo,et al.  A nearest-nodes finite element method with local multivariate Lagrange interpolation , 2008 .

[8]  R. Goeree,et al.  Mortality, Independence in Living, and Re-fracture, One Year Following Hip Fracture in Canadians , 2000 .

[9]  R. Hinton,et al.  The association of age, race, and sex with the location of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  O. Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures , 1996 .

[11]  W. Leslie,et al.  Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. , 2009, JAMA.

[12]  F. Kainberger,et al.  QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA , 2012, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  Wilma M Hopman,et al.  Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hip fracture risk , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  S. Jamal,et al.  Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[16]  D. Lennox,et al.  Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  A. Tenenhouse,et al.  Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: Implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis , 2010, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  W. Leslie,et al.  Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. , 2005, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[19]  T. Anastassiades,et al.  The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  M. Karagas,et al.  Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  C. Rubin.  Evaluation and Management of Hip Fracture Risk in the Aged , 2012, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[23]  R. Eastell,et al.  Use of DXA‐Based Structural Engineering Models of the Proximal Femur to Discriminate Hip Fracture , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  Thomas J Beck,et al.  Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: Understanding hip structure analysis , 2007, Current osteoporosis reports.

[25]  G U Rao,et al.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[26]  M. V. Van Natta,et al.  Epidemiology of Hip Fractures Among the Elderly: Risk Factors for Fracture Type , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Songning Zhang,et al.  Examination of femoral-neck structure using finite element model and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  L. Lix,et al.  Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women , 2011, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  C. Kovacs,et al.  Predicting fracture using 2D finite element modelling. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[32]  R. Goeree,et al.  Economic Implications of Hip Fracture: Health Service Use, Institutional Care and Cost in Canada , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[33]  A. LaCroix,et al.  Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density? , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[34]  J. Brown,et al.  The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[35]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Kerrie M. Sanders,et al.  The human cost of fracture , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[37]  F. Kainberger,et al.  A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro. , 2013, Bone.

[38]  N. Lane,et al.  Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  W. Leslie,et al.  Population-based Canadian hip fracture rates with international comparisons , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[40]  L. Thabane,et al.  Health-related quality of life measurements in elderly Canadians with osteoporosis compared to other chronic medical conditions: a population-based study from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[41]  Lehana Thabane,et al.  Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[42]  Judith E. Adams,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography. , 2009, European journal of radiology.