In our days we face a fundamental issue concerning road signs. We may display contents in vertical and horizontal format (static signs, variable message signs, road markings), either on a post, a gantry or a dashboard. And we foresee a coming age where the excellent matrix resolution of painted signs will be truly approached by the resolution of full matrix displays. But we also risk a babel context threatening the universal approach encouraged by international catalogues as the 1968 Convention (ECE/TRANS/196, 2007). And the fundamental risk comes from our decisions regarding how the transition from the contents and formats displayed on static message signs to the ones displayed on electronic signs (in gantries or dashboards) should be. Our work explores this issue specifically, considering the transition from Advance Direction Signs (static message signs, class G, 1 in the 1968 Convention) to what could be termed Advance Location Signs (signs concerning the location of variable events with regards to certain landmarks) developed as an adaptation of the G, 1 class to electronic traffic signs. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/CIT2016.2016.3217
[1]
Barbara Tversky,et al.
Visuospatial Reasoning
,
2004
.
[2]
Geoffrey Underwood,et al.
THE PRIMING FUNCTION OF ROAD SIGNS
,
2001
.
[3]
Michel Liger.
MELYSSA CORRIDOR (MEDITERRANEAN-LYON-STUTTGART SITE FOR ATT)
,
1993
.
[4]
Arthur B. Markman,et al.
Knowledge Representation
,
1998
.
[5]
M. Denis.
The description of routes : A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse
,
1997
.
[6]
M. Krampen.
Icons of the road
,
1983
.
[7]
Benjamin K. Bergen,et al.
Writing Direction Influences Spatial Cognition
,
2005
.
[8]
K. Holyoak.
Analogy and Relational Reasoning
,
2012
.
[9]
Maxwell Lay,et al.
Design of Traffic Signs
,
2004
.
[10]
Roland Haitz,et al.
Solid‐state lighting: ‘The case’ 10 years after and future prospects
,
2011
.
[11]
Max J. Egenhofer,et al.
Structure and Semantics of Arrow Diagrams
,
2005,
COSIT.