The Authority of Wikipedia

Philosophers of argumentation and of testimony suggest that we can rely on what someone says because of its epistemic merits. If so, then we should never credit Wikipedia, since we cannot assess what its anonymous contributors know. I propose instead that Wikipedia can have pragmatic merits, in that the contributors' passion for the project, and the emerging communicative design through which that passion is made manifest, provide a reason for trust.

[1]  Richard D. Rieke,et al.  Argumentation and critical decision making , 1975 .

[2]  T. Govier.  A practical study of argument , 1985 .

[3]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[4]  Elizabeth Fricker,et al.  Critical NoticeTelling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony , 1995 .

[5]  Elizabeth Fricker,et al.  Telling and Trusting: Reductionism andAnti- Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony , 1995 .

[6]  David B. Hume,et al.  An Equiry Concerning Human Understanding , 1999 .

[7]  F. Kauffeld,et al.  The Ordinary Practice of Presuming and Presumption with Special Attention to Veracity and the Burden of Proof , 2003 .

[8]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Bryan A. Pendleton,et al.  Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie , 2006 .

[10]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[11]  Paul Duguid,et al.  Limits of self-organization: Peer production and "laws of quality" , 2006, First Monday.

[12]  Andrew Keen,et al.  Book Review: Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. London and Boston, MA: Currency/Doubleday, 2007. 228 pp. ISBN 0—3855—2080—8, $22.95 (pbk) , 2008, New Media Soc..

[13]  John Riedl,et al.  Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia , 2007, GROUP.

[14]  Heidi E. Buchanan,et al.  Collectivism vs. Individualism in a Wiki World: Librarians Respond to Jaron Lanier's Essay “Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism” , 2007 .

[15]  Hyla H. Polen,et al.  Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Wikipedia , 2008, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[16]  Lucy Holman Rector.  Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles , 2008 .

[17]  Don Fallis,et al.  Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  P. Magnus.  On Trusting Wikipedia , 2009, Episteme.

[19]  Grace Thornton,et al.  Everything is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  L. M. Sanger.  The Fate of Expertise after Wikipedia , 2009, Episteme.

[21]  J. Bennett,et al.  Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding , 2010 .

[22]  Joseph M. Reagle,et al.  The Pursuit of the Universal Encyclopedia , 2010 .

[23]  Lyndon Harris,et al.  The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations , 2011 .

[24]  Patricia R. Ladd,et al.  The Wikipedia revolution : how a bunch of nobodies created the world's greatest encyclopedia , 2009 .