Let Them Play: The Impact of Mechanics and Dynamics of a Serious Game on Student Perceptions of Learning Engagement

Serious games are becoming important educational tools and are increasingly being integrated into courses in many different academic areas and widely portrayed as a means of helping individuals concentrate on the subject matter and enjoy learning. This paper discusses the development and testing of a serious game by using a research model where the mechanics and dynamics of the game impact perceived usefulness, ease of use, and goal clarity, which in turn lead to higher concentration and user enjoyment. This model was tested in an undergraduate product design classroom, and evaluated using a survey and a focus group. The results of qualitative and quantitative analysis show that higher concentration and enjoyment occur when students perceive clear goals, ease of use, and usefulness during gaming. The results of the study leads to recommendations to game developers on the features of serious games that need to be built and the need to carefully consider the mechanics and dynamics of a game. The results should encourage instructors to consider incorporating serious games into their classes to increase their students’ learning engagement.

[1]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[2]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[4]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[5]  Blake Ives,et al.  APC Forum: Business Implications of Virtual Worlds and Serious Gaming , 2008, MIS Q. Executive.

[6]  Nathan W. Twyman,et al.  Taking "Fun and Games" Seriously: Proposing the Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model (HMSAM) , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Sheng-Chin Yu,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu , 2022 .

[8]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Wen-Hao Huang,et al.  Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Wynne W. Chin.  How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[12]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[13]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Nicole Fruehauf.  Flow The Psychology Of Optimal Experience , 2016 .

[15]  Gonzalo Farias,et al.  Understanding automatic control concepts by playing games , 2011 .

[16]  Yuan-Bang Cheng,et al.  The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[18]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  A Multidimensional Commitment Model of Volitional Systems Adoption and Usage Behavior , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Yuan-Bang Cheng,et al.  A constructionism framework for designing game-like learning systems: Its effect on different learners , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Bertrand Schneider,et al.  Benefits of a Tangible Interface for Collaborative Learning and Interaction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[21]  Jodi Asbell-Clarke,et al.  Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Gamification for Engaging Computer Science Students in Learning Activities: A Case Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[23]  Noe Vargas Hernandez,et al.  Improving Engineering Design Education: From Skills to Educational Objectives , 2010 .

[24]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Digital Games and Beyond: What Happens When Players Compete , 2013, MIS Q..

[25]  Alessandro De Gloria,et al.  Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Charles N. Greene,et al.  An Evaluation of Causal Models Linking the Received Role with Job Satisfaction. , 1973 .

[27]  Johannes Keller,et al.  Locus of control and the flow experience: An experimental analysis , 2008 .

[28]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Current Practices in Serious Game Research: A Review from a Learning Outcomes Perspective , 2009 .

[29]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications , 1975 .

[30]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[31]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[32]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[33]  K. Squire,et al.  HARNESSING THE POWER OF GAMES IN EDUCATION , 2003 .

[34]  Ping Zhang,et al.  A person-artefact-task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[36]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Flow Construct in Online Environments : A Structural Modeling Approach , 1998 .

[37]  Barbara D. Klein,et al.  Beyond the Test of the Four Channel Model of Flow in the Context of Online Shopping , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Ming-Chi Lee,et al.  Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Jesse Schell,et al.  The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses , 2019 .

[40]  Tsung-Hsien Kuo,et al.  How can one amplify the effect of e-learning? An examination of high-tech employees' computer attitude and flow experience , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Pablo Pando Cerra,et al.  Design and use of a multimedia trainer for the subject Descriptive Geometry , 2009, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[42]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[43]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Michel Billaud,et al.  Pedagogical evaluation of remote laboratories in eMerge project , 2007 .

[45]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems , 2013, MIS Q..

[46]  K. Kiili.  Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[47]  Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang,et al.  Building virtual cities, inspiring intelligent citizens: Digital games for developing students' problem solving and learning motivation , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Effective affective user interface design in games , 2003, Ergonomics.

[49]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[50]  D. Eichel.  Beyond Boredom And Anxiety Experiencing Flow In Work And Play , 2016 .

[51]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  M. Stone.  Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[53]  Christopher Spencer,et al.  Learning a new area with and without the use of tactile maps: a comparative study , 1985 .

[54]  Shu Z. Schiller,et al.  Let Them Play! Active Learning in a Virtual World , 2013, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[55]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[56]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[57]  Chetan S. Sankar,et al.  Using Serious Games in Data Communications and Networking Management Course , 2018, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Engagement Theory: A Framework for Technology-Based Teaching and Learning. , 1998 .

[59]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.