Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Ronacher,et al. Influence of amplitude modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[2] Mark A. Bee,et al. Do female frogs exploit inadvertent social information to locate breeding aggregations , 2007 .
[3] C E Schreiner,et al. Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. , 2004, Physiological reviews.
[4] Franz Huber,et al. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .
[5] Ruth Y Litovsky,et al. The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Josh H. McDermott. The cocktail party problem , 2009, Current Biology.
[7] H. Gerhardt,et al. Effects of heterospecific call overlap on the phonotactic behaviour of grey treefrogs , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[8] R. H. Wiley,et al. Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.
[9] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Phonotaxis in Female Frogs and Toads: Execution and Design of Experiments , 1995 .
[10] Thierry Aubin,et al. Cocktail–party effect in king penguin colonies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[11] Mark A. Bee,et al. An experimental test of noise-dependent voice amplitude regulation in Cope’s grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis , 2010, Animal Behaviour.
[12] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[13] Gary J. Rose,et al. Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[14] M. A. Bee,et al. Sound source segregation in grey treefrogs: spatial release from masking by the sound of a chorus , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[15] J. Schwartz,et al. FORMS OF CALL OVERLAP AND THEIR IMPACT ON ADVERTISEMENT CALL ATTRACTIVENESS TO FEMALES OF THE GRAY TREEFROG, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 2006 .
[16] H. Gerhardt,et al. Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[17] D. Grantham,et al. Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Mark A Bee,et al. Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] LORI WOLLERMAN,et al. Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frogHyla ebraccata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[21] H. Brumm,et al. Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .
[22] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Georg M. Klump,et al. Phonotactic responses and selectivity of barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) to chorus sounds , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[24] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.
[25] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .
[27] Johannes Schul,et al. Phonotaxis to male’s calls embedded within a chorus by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[28] G. Rose,et al. Auditory midbrain neurons that count , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[29] T. Lengagne,et al. Multiple signals and male spacing affect female preference at cocktail parties in treefrogs , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[30] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[31] G. Fellers. Aggression, territoriality, and mating behaviour in North American treefrogs , 1979, Animal Behaviour.
[32] Alejandro Vélez,et al. Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[33] Brandon Lentine,et al. Effect of anomalous pulse timing on call discrimination by females of the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor): behavioral correlates of neurobiology , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[34] Mark A. Bee,et al. Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[35] P. K. McGregor,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks , 2005 .
[36] Stewart H. Hulse,et al. Auditory scene analysis in animal communication , 2002 .
[37] J. Schwartz,et al. Interference risk and the function of dynamic shifts in calling in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[38] Johannes Schul,et al. Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[39] Israel Nelken,et al. Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.
[40] Georg M. Klump,et al. Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics , 1995, BioMethods.
[41] Ulrike Langemann,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Perception and acoustic communication networks , 2005 .
[42] Roy D Patterson,et al. The mutual roles of temporal glimpsing and vocal characteristics in cocktail-party listening. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] Georg M. Klump,et al. Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.
[44] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[45] Mark A. Bee,et al. Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[46] D. Kroodsma,et al. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .
[47] Mark A. Bee,et al. Selective phonotaxis by male wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to the sound of a chorus , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[48] M. A. Bee,et al. The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[49] Anthony Arak,et al. Sexual selection by male–male competition in natterjack toad choruses , 1983, Nature.
[50] Todd M Freeberg,et al. Acoustic interaction in animal groups: signaling in noisy and social contexts. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[51] J. Schul,et al. Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[52] R. Haven Wiley,et al. Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[53] Mark A. Bee,et al. Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs , 2012, Hearing Research.