Touch improves visual discrimination of object features in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.)

Primates perceive many object features through vision and touch. To date, little is known on how the synergy of these two sensory modalities contributes to enhance object recognition. Here, we investigated in capuchin monkeys (N = 12) whether manipulating objects and retaining tactile information enhanced visual recognition of geometrical object properties on different scales. Capuchins were trained to visually select the rewarded one of two objects differing in size, shape (larger-scale) or surface structure (smaller-scale). Objects were explored in two experimental conditions: the Sight condition prevented capuchins from touching the chosen object; the Sight and Touch condition allowed them to touch the selected object. Our results indicated that tactile information increased the capuchins' learning speed for visual discrimination of object features. Moreover, the capuchins' learning speed was higher in both size and shape discrimination compared to surface discrimination regardless of the availability of tactile input. Overall, our data demonstrated that the acquisition of tactile information about object features was advantageous for the capuchins and allowed them to achieve high levels of visual accuracy faster. This suggests that information from touch potentiated object recognition in the visual modality.

[1]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Manual skills for processing plant underground storage organs by wild bearded capuchins. , 2019, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  R. Lickliter,et al.  Intersensory redundancy facilitates prenatal perceptual learning in bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) embryos. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[3]  B. Winters,et al.  Exploiting Novelty and Oddity Exploratory Preferences in Rodents to Study Multisensory Object Memory and Perception , 2018 .

[4]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses , 1978 .

[5]  P. Krueger,et al.  Multiple sensory modalities used by squid in successful predator evasion throughout ontogeny , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Makoto Mizunami,et al.  Convergence of multimodal sensory pathways to the mushroom body calyx in Drosophila melanogaster , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  M. Knaden,et al.  Desert ants benefit from combining visual and olfactory landmarks , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Nektarios Tavernarakis,et al.  Multimodal sensory processing in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2018, Open Biology.

[10]  Céline Cappe,et al.  The variability of multisensory processes of natural stimuli in human and non-human primates in a detection task , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  C. Reed,et al.  Hand function, not proximity, biases visuotactile integration later in object processing: An ERP study , 2019, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  K. James,et al.  Cross-modal versus within-modal recall: Differences in behavioral and brain responses , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Functions of the Hand in Primates , 2016 .

[14]  Roman Liepelt,et al.  Embodied cognition in multitasking: increased hand-specific task shielding when stimuli are presented near the hand , 2019, Psychological Research.

[15]  Antonia Thelen,et al.  The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories. , 2013, Multisensory research.

[16]  Sridhar Ravi,et al.  The answer is blowing in the wind: free-flying honeybees can integrate visual and mechano-sensory inputs for making complex foraging decisions , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  Thomas Mehner,et al.  Multimodal mixed messages: the use of multiple cues allows greater accuracy in social recognition and predator detection decisions in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki , 2010 .

[18]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Physical properties of palm fruits processed with tools by wild bearded capuchins (Cebus libidinosus) , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[20]  Global/local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in a conflict–choice task by capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) , 2017, Animal Cognition.

[21]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Cross-modal object recognition and dynamic weighting of sensory inputs in a fish , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  V. Truppa,et al.  Global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[23]  Paola Carducci,et al.  Tactile information improves visual object discrimination in kea, Nestor notabilis, and capuchin monkeys, Sapajus spp. , 2018, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination , 2015, Cognition.

[25]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Valentina Truppa,et al.  Selection of Effective Stone Tools by Wild Bearded Capuchin Monkeys , 2009, Current Biology.

[27]  J. Fuster,et al.  Visuo-tactile cross-modal associations in cortical somatosensory cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  A. Cowey,et al.  Cross-modal matching in the rhesus monkey using a single pair of stimuli , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  M. Cartmill.  Rethinking primate origins. , 1974, Science.

[30]  R. K. Davenport,et al.  Intermodal Equivalence of Stimuli in Apes , 1970, Science.

[31]  C. Wall,et al.  Food properties influence grasping strategies in strepsirrhines , 2019, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

[32]  V. Truppa,et al.  Short-term memory effects on visual global/local processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.). , 2016, Journal of comparative psychology.

[33]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Benefits of multisensory learning , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[35]  S. Lacey,et al.  Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[36]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Wild Bearded Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) Strategically Place Nuts in a Stable Position during Nut-Cracking , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  F. Aureli,et al.  The role of sucrose and sensory systems in fruit selection and consumption of Ateles geoffroyi in Yucatan, Mexico , 2015, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[38]  E. Rouiller,et al.  Multisensory Integration in Non-Human Primates during a Sensory-Motor Task , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Uttam Bhat,et al.  How chimpanzees integrate sensory information to select figs , 2016, Interface Focus.

[40]  Kenneth L Chiou,et al.  Explosive Pleistocene range expansion leads to widespread Amazonian sympatry between robust and gracile capuchin monkeys , 2012 .

[41]  G. Sabbatini,et al.  Object grasping and manipulation in capuchin monkeys (genera Cebus and Sapajus) , 2018, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

[42]  Charles W. Martin,et al.  Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators , 2010, Oecologia.

[43]  D. Hanuš,et al.  Does Presentation Format Influence Visual Size Discrimination in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus spp.)? , 2015, PloS one.

[44]  M. Laska,et al.  Which senses play a role in nonhuman primate food selection? A comparison between squirrel monkeys and spider monkeys , 2007, American journal of primatology.

[45]  Joaquín M. Fuster,et al.  Neuronal activity of somatosensory cortex in a cross-modal (visuo-haptic) memory task , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Manual exploratory procedures and asymmetries for a haptic search task: a comparison between capuchins (Cebus apella) and humans. , 1997, Laterality.

[47]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Audiovisual Integration in Nonhuman Primates: A Window into the Anatomy and Physiology of Cognition , 2011 .

[48]  P. Blakeslee,et al.  Cross-modal transfer of discrimination learing in Cebus monkeys. , 1966, Behaviour.

[49]  M. Lawes,et al.  Fruit Ripening Signals and Cues in a Madagascan Dry Forest: Haptic Indicators Reliably Indicate Fruit Ripeness to Dichromatic Lemurs , 2016, Evolutionary Biology.

[50]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Multisensory context portends object memory , 2014, Current Biology.

[51]  Christopher C. Davoli,et al.  Altered vision near the hands , 2008, Cognition.

[52]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Multisensory Facilitation of Behavior in Monkeys: Effects of Stimulus Intensity , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Dorothy M. Fragaszy,et al.  How wild bearded capuchin monkeys select stones and nuts to minimize the number of strikes per nut cracked , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  Leandro Jerusalinsky,et al.  Three stones for three seeds: natural occurrence of selective tool use by capuchins (Cebus libidinosus) based on an analysis of the weight of stones found at nutting sites , 2010, American journal of primatology.

[55]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.