Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of a New Self-etching/Self-adhesive Pit and Fissure Sealant.

PURPOSE To evaluate shear bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant on prismless enamel compared with conventional fissure sealing. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 90 extracted third molars were assigned to 3 main groups: group 1: self-etching/self-adhesive sealant, without acid etching; group 2: self-etching/self-adhesive sealant, with prior acid etching; group 3: conventional fissure sealing (control group). After specimen preparation, each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to storage time (1-day water storage, 3-month water storage, and 1-day water storage followed by 5000x thermocycling). The shear bond strength was determined with a universal testing machine, according to ISO standard 29022. Afterwards, the failure mode was analyzed. An additional 24 third molars were used for microleakage assessment. The fissure pattern was sealed in strict accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. After thermocycling, the dye penetration was examined. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-Test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS The shear bond strength of the self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant without prior acid etching was significantly lower (4.3 MPa) than that of the self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant with prior acid etching (17.1 MPa) and the conventional fissure sealing (19.1 MPa). Microleakage was significantly lower in the control group (1.1%) and in the group with the self-etching/self-adhesive sealant with prior acid etching (0.8%) compared to the group that used the self-etching/self-adhesive material alone (49.4%). CONCLUSION The self-etching/self-adhesive fissure sealant can be recommended for clinical use when enamel is etched with phosphoric acid. The self-etching/self-adhesive sealant without prior acid etching showed significantly inferior results.

[1]  Y. Yilmaz,et al.  Bond strength and microleakage of self-adhesive and conventional fissure sealants. , 2014, Dental materials journal.

[2]  M. D. De Goes,et al.  Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. , 2014, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[3]  A. Baghban,et al.  Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  A. Fok,et al.  Effect of artificial aging on the bond durability of fissure sealants. , 2013, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[5]  J. Dhillon,et al.  Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three pit and fissure sealants using conventional etch or self-etching primer. , 2012, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[6]  U. Mansmann,et al.  Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing--results from a meta-analysis. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  Alvaro Della Bona,et al.  The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  K. Vandewalle,et al.  Degree of microleakage of a self-etch sealant. , 2011, General dentistry.

[9]  J. Perdigão,et al.  In vitro sealing potential of a self-adhesive pit and fissure sealant. , 2011, Quintessence international.

[10]  Siegward D Heintze,et al.  Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. A review in 3 parts. Part 3: in vitro tests of adhesive systems. , 2011, Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia.

[11]  R. Braga,et al.  Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  F. Mante,et al.  Bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etch sealant. , 2009, Quintessence international.

[13]  F. Mante,et al.  Enamel bond strength of self-etch sealant with and without prior acid etching. , 2009, The New York state dental journal.

[14]  Anne Nordblad,et al.  Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  N. Moszner,et al.  Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[16]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Bond strength of a sealant to primary and permanent enamel: phosphoric acid versus self-etching adhesive. , 2004, Pediatric dentistry.

[17]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[18]  F. Lagerlöf,et al.  Cariology; preventive dentistry: Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[19]  J. Roulet Marginal integrity: clinical significance. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[20]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Factors influencing the effectiveness of sealants--a meta-analysis. , 1993, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[21]  R. Anderson,et al.  A review of published fissure sealant trials using multiple regression analysis. , 1982, Journal of dentistry.

[22]  M. Buonocore,et al.  Sealing of pits and fissures with an adhesive resin: its use in caries prevention. , 1967, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[23]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.