Novelties Within the Framework for Information System Due Diligence

ABSTRACT The information system (IS) field lacks a scientifically based analytical tool for rapid delivery of IS due diligence. In 2013, a framework for IS due diligence (FISDD) was published. The work on this framework was continued with proceeding development and evaluation. One of the most important objectives of today’s business is making savings concerning various resources. The main novelty of the upgraded framework is the replacement of some of the manually conducted questionnaires with web-based questionnaires. This novelty reduces the total time required for on-site ISDD activities by 35–50%, as has been the result of several real cases. The results demonstrate and confirm the usefulness of upgrading FISDD, which increases its efficiency in DD processes, which is the main contribution of this article.

[1]  Tadej Kanduc,et al.  Information System Mirror – Approach How to Analyze Information System Strengths and Weaknesses within Organization , 2015 .

[2]  Marko Bajec,et al.  Framework for the Delivery of Information System Due Diligence , 2013, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[3]  Rebecca Herold,et al.  Managing an Information Security and Privacy Awareness and Training Program, Second Edition , 2010 .

[4]  Ahmad A. Rabaa'i.  Assessing information systems success models: empirical comparison (research in progress) , 2009 .

[5]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT Service Climate: An Extension to IT Service Quality Research , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Narcyz Roztocki,et al.  Information technology investments in emerging economies , 2008 .

[7]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[8]  L. Spedding.  Due Diligence and Corporate Governance , 2005 .

[9]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Information Technology Interaction Model: A Foundation for the MBA Core Course , 1995, MIS Q..

[12]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[14]  Neda Abasi,et al.  Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable , 2015 .

[15]  M. Bajec,et al.  Information system due diligence data as an input for knowledge management , 2013 .

[16]  Kamila Tišlerová.  Information Interaction in Terms of e-Commerce , 2012 .

[17]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Measuring IS System Service Quality with SERVQUAL: Users' Perceptions of Relative Importance of the Five SERVPERF Dimensions , 2009, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[18]  Stephen J. Andriole,et al.  Mining for Digital Gold: Technology Due Diligence for CIOs , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  User Satisfaction: An Overarching Measure of Enterprise System Success , 2005, PACIS.

[20]  T. Mittendorf,et al.  Vendor Due Diligence , 2005 .

[21]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Measuring IS User Satisfaction: Review and Implications , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..