A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON INTERGENERATIONAL SUPPORT

ABSTRACT It has often been argued that Southern European countries are more familialistic in their culture than Western and Northern European countries. In this paper, we examine this notion by testing the hypothesis that adult children are more responsive to the needs of their elderly parents in countries with more familialistic attitudes. To test this hypothesis, we analyse the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). We focus on three indicators of need: (a) the partner status of the parent, (b) the health status of the parent, and (c) the education of the parent. Using Heckman probit models, we examine the effects of these variables on whether or not the parent receives instrumental support from children, thereby controlling for whether or not children live independently from their parents. We estimate effects of need on support and we compare these effects across 10 European countries, using both graphic devices and a multilevel probit model where individuals are nested in countries. We find significant cross-level interactions of need variables and the degree of familialism in a country. Our analyses, thereby provide more positive evidence for the hypothesis than earlier studies, which have focused largely on comparing aggregate levels of support among countries.

[1]  R. K. Raley,et al.  Intergenerational Coresidence and Contact: A Longitudinal Analysis of Adult Children's Response to Their Mother's Widowhood , 1996 .

[2]  Vern L. Bengtson,et al.  Factors That Predispose Middle-Aged Sons and Daughters to Provide Social Support to Older Parents. , 1995 .

[3]  F. Block,et al.  Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies , 2001 .

[4]  J. Ogg,et al.  European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers , 2005, European journal of ageing.

[5]  Donald Cox Motives for Private Income Transfers , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  B. Soldo,et al.  Household composition choices of older unmarried women , 1988, Demography.

[7]  P. Dykstra Next of (non)kin: The importance of primary relationships for older adults' well-being. , 1991 .

[8]  Ron Lesthaeghe,et al.  Value changes and the dimensions of familism in the European community , 1987 .

[9]  John R. Logan,et al.  Sons daughters and intergenerational social support. , 1990 .

[10]  C. Stein,et al.  "Because They're My Parents": An Intergenerational Study of Felt Obligation and Parental Caregiving , 1998 .

[11]  M. Kalmijn Gender Differences in the Effects of Divorce, Widowhood and Remarriage on Intergenerational Support: Does Marriage Protect Fathers? , 2007 .

[12]  A. Lowenstein,et al.  Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study , 2006, Ageing and Society.

[13]  Antti Karisto,et al.  Contacts between elderly parents and their children in four European countries: current patterns and future prospects , 2004, European journal of ageing.

[14]  D. Eggebeen Family Structure and Intergenerational Exchanges , 1992 .

[15]  J. Ogg,et al.  The support of parents in old age by those born during 1945–1954: a European perspective , 2006, Ageing and Society.

[16]  S. O. Daatland,et al.  ‘Lost solidarity’ or ‘changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity , 2003, Ageing and Society.

[17]  Cara Williams,et al.  The sandwich generation , 2004 .

[18]  A. Liefbroer,et al.  The effect of parental resources on patterns of leaving home among young adults in the Netherlands , 1991 .

[19]  Thierry Debrand,et al.  Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe , 2007 .

[20]  Francesco C. Billari,et al.  Leaving home: a comparative analysis of ECHP data , 2002 .

[21]  N. K. Chadha,et al.  Intergenerational solidarity. , 1997, The Indian journal of medical research.

[22]  M. Rein,et al.  There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out , 1999, Ageing and Society.

[23]  A. Motel-Klingebiel,et al.  Welfare states do not crowd out the family: evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses , 2005, Ageing and Society.

[24]  C. Saraceno,et al.  First European Quality of Life Survey. Families, work and social networks , 2005 .

[25]  R. T. Coward,et al.  Filial Responsibility Expectations and Patterns of Intergenerational Assistance , 1994 .

[26]  M. Kohli Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state , 1999 .

[27]  M. Haller,et al.  Kinship and social networks in modern societies: a cross-cultural comparison among seven nations , 1990 .

[28]  Loek Halman,et al.  The European Values Study: A Third Wave. Sourcebook of the 1999/2000 European Values Study Surveys , 2001 .

[29]  E. Grundy,et al.  Between elderly parents and adult children: a new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich generation’ , 2006, Ageing and Society.

[30]  L. Hassing,et al.  State provision down, offspring's up: the reverse substitution of old-age care in Sweden , 2003, Ageing and Society.

[31]  F. Wolff,et al.  Complementarity between private and public transfers , 2002 .

[32]  S. Lynch,et al.  Caregiving networks of elderly persons: variation by marital status. , 1999, The Gerontologist.

[33]  J. Kemeny Theories of Power in the Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism , 1995 .

[34]  R. Muffels,et al.  The Impact of Young Children on Women’s Labour Supply , 2005 .

[35]  R. Nesse,et al.  Older Adults' Perceptions of Intergenerational Support After Widowhood , 2006 .

[36]  Francesco C. Billari,et al.  Leaving home in Europe: the experience of cohorts born around 1960 , 2001 .

[37]  G. Spitze,et al.  Sandwiched Marriages: The Implications of Child and Parent Relations for Marital Quality in Midlife , 1998 .

[38]  T. Tilburg,et al.  Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children: Normative and structural explanations , 1999 .

[39]  D. Reher Family Ties in Western Europe: Persistent Contrasts , 1998 .

[40]  A. Davey,et al.  Do safety nets work ? The role of anticipated help in times of need , 1998 .

[41]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Does differential social support cause sex differences in bereavement outcome , 1999 .

[42]  J. Lewis Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe , 2018 .

[43]  A. Kapteyn,et al.  First Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (2004-2007) : Starting the longitudinal dimension , 2008 .

[44]  Jenny Williams,et al.  The Kaleidoscope of care : a review of research on welfare provision for elderly people , 1990 .

[45]  P. Rossi,et al.  Of Human Bonding , 2018 .

[46]  Vern L. Bengtson,et al.  Intergenerational Solidarity and the Structure of Adult Child‐Parent Relationships in American Families , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  M. Kalmijn Educational Inequality and Family Relationships: Influences on Contact and Proximity , 2006 .

[48]  George H. Jakubson,et al.  The connection between public transfers and private interfamily transfers , 1995 .

[49]  R. Mahon,et al.  Gender, Equality, and Welfare States , 1997 .

[50]  Jim Ogg,et al.  Le soutien familial intergénérationnel dans l'Europe élargie : Le soutien aux personnes âgées en Europe , 2005 .

[51]  M. Silverstein,et al.  Does intergenerational social support influence the psychological well-being of older parents? The contingencies of declining health and widowhood. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[52]  Anneli Anttonen,et al.  European Social Care Services: Is It Possible To Identify Models ? , 1996 .

[53]  R. Berthoud,et al.  Social Europe: living standards and welfare states , 2004 .

[54]  E. Grundy,et al.  Revisiting convergence and divergence: support for older people in Europe , 2004, European journal of ageing.