Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000–2010)

This study analyzes coauthorship patterns in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) for the period 2000 to 2010. The basis for the analysis is the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB‐SHW), a comprehensive bibliographic database of peer‐reviewed publications in the SSH by researchers affiliated with Flemish universities. Combining data on journal articles and book chapters, our findings indicate that collaborative publishing in the SSH is increasing, though considerable differences between disciplines remain. Conversely, we did observe a sharp decline in single‐author publishing. We further demonstrate that coauthored SSH articles in journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) generally have a higher (and growing) number of coauthors than do either those in non‐WoS journals or book chapters. This illustrates the need to include non‐WoS data and book chapters when studying coauthorship in the SSH.

[1]  D. Hicks.  The Four Literatures of Social Science , 2004 .

[2]  Luka Kronegger,et al.  Dynamic Scientific Co-Authorship Networks , 2012 .

[3]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[4]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The Digital Future is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities , 2009, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[7]  L. Butler,et al.  Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas , 2003 .

[8]  James W. Endersby.  Collaborative research in the social sciences : Multiple authorship and publication credit , 1996 .

[9]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al.  Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research , 1988, Scientometrics.

[10]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Comments on the modified collaborative coefficient , 2011, Scientometrics.

[12]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems , 2004 .

[13]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9) , 2012 .

[14]  HsiuJu Rebecca Yen,et al.  Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: A comparative study of collaborative measures , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[15]  Helena Bukvova.  Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[16]  Debora Shaw,et al.  A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Leo Egghe.  Theory of collaboration and collaborative measures , 1991, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations , 2005, Scientometrics.

[19]  Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al.  A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  G. Laudel.  What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .

[21]  Linda Butler,et al.  Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: A review of the concerns and the evidence , 2010 .

[22]  D. Hicks.  Performance-based university research funding systems , 2012 .

[23]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[24]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[25]  M. Biagioli,et al.  Scientific Authorship : Credit and Intellectual Property in Science , 2004 .

[26]  J. Schneider.  An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway , 2009 .

[27]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Eric H. J. Spruyt,et al.  Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[29]  G. Melin.  Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[30]  Caroline S. Wagner,et al.  Mapping the network of global science: comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000 , 2005 .

[31]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[32]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.

[33]  Juan Gorraiz,et al.  The different flavors of research collaboration: a case study of their influence on university excellence in four world regions , 2012, Scientometrics.

[34]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Visibility of collaboration on the Web , 2004, Scientometrics.

[35]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .