An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships between Ethical Beliefs , Ethical Ideology , Political Preference and Need for Closure of Dutch-Speaking Consumers in Belgium

An analysis is presented of the relationships between consumers’ ethical beliefs, ethical ideology, Machiavellianism, political preference and the individual difference variable "need for closure". It is based on a representative survey of 286 Belgian respondents. Standard measurement tools of proven reliability and robustness are used to measure ethical beliefs (consumer ethics scale), ethical ideology (ethical positioning), Machiavellianism (Mach IV scale) and need for closure. The analysis finds the following. First, individuals with a high need for closure tend to have beliefs that are more ethical as regards possible consumer actions, and score higher on idealism and lower on Machiavellianism, than those with a low need for closure. Second, a correlation exists between political preference and ethical beliefs. Third, a significant relationship exists between ethical ideology and political preference for the two largest political parties. Fourth, individuals with a high and low need for closure have different political preferences for right-wing and left-wing parties.

[1]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[2]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Behavior , 2024 .

[3]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the need for closure scale. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  S. Vitell,et al.  Consumer ethics: The possible effects of terrorism and civil unrest on the ethical values of consumers , 1994 .

[5]  J. Lumpkin,et al.  Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers , 1991 .

[6]  Anusorn Singhapakdi,et al.  Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives , 1990 .

[7]  O. C. Ferrell,et al.  A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing , 1985 .

[8]  Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas,et al.  Do Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs Vary with Age? A Substantiation of Kohlberg’s Typology in Marketing , 1998 .

[9]  Lawrence B. Chonko,et al.  Marketing and Machiavellianism , 1984 .

[10]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. , 1993, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[11]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. Forsyth.  A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. , 1980 .

[13]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment , 1978 .

[14]  Sudhir H. Kale,et al.  Grouping Euroconsumers: A Culture-Based Clustering Approach , 1995 .

[15]  Michael P. Ward,et al.  Machiavellianism and Tolerance of Ambiguity , 1998 .

[16]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Riggio,et al.  The interrelationships of self-monitoring factors, personality traits, and nonverbal social skills , 1982 .

[18]  Gene R. Laczniak,et al.  Fostering ethical marketing decisions , 1991 .

[19]  C. M. Schaninger.  Perceived Risk and Personality , 1976 .

[20]  Gordon L. Patzer,et al.  Consumer ethics in cross‐cultural settings , 1995 .

[21]  S. Vitell,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Ethical Values of Consumers: The Potential Effect of War and Civil Disruption , 1998 .

[22]  S. Hunt,et al.  A General Theory of Marketing Ethics , 1986 .

[23]  Markus Kemmelmeier.  Need for Closure and Political Orientation Among German University Students , 1997 .

[24]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[25]  Philip G. Zimbardo,et al.  Personality profiles and political parties , 1999 .

[26]  D. Strutton,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the ethical values of American and Australian consumers: Direct marketing implications , 1996 .

[27]  M. Rawwas.  Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers , 1996 .

[28]  James A. Muncy,et al.  Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. , 1992 .

[29]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[30]  N. Brand,et al.  Information processing efficiency and noise. Interactions with personal rigidity , 1995 .

[31]  James H. Barnes,et al.  Consumer ethical beliefs and personality traits: An exploratory analysis , 1994 .

[32]  Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas,et al.  Consumer ethics: a cross‐cultural investigation , 1997 .

[33]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Interactive Effects of Need for Closure and Initial Confidence on Social Information Seeking , 1991 .

[34]  Andrew M. Chan,et al.  Ethical Beliefs of Chinese Consumers in Hong Kong , 1998 .

[35]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[36]  James A. Muncy,et al.  Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumer , 1992 .

[37]  Travis K Suggs,et al.  Machiavellianism, Adjustment, and Ethics , 1999 .

[38]  R. Erffmeyer,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Japanese Consumer Ethics , 1999 .