Order Statistics for Convergence Velocity Analysis of Simplified Evolutionary Algorithms

Abstract The theory of order statistics is utilized in this paper to analyze the convergence velocity ϕ of simplified evolutionary algorithms based on mutation and (μ + , λ)-selection. A general, representation-independent way of theoretical analysis is outlined and put in concrete terms for two specific objective functions: The binary counting ones objective function and the continuous sphere model. This way, the same method of theoretical analysis describes the behavior of a search strategy similar to a genetic algorithm as well as a search strategy similar to an evolution strategy. The resulting convergence velocity graphics exhibit a striking similarity, such that the underlying principles of evolutionary search seem to be valid independently of the particular search space. The expectations E ( Z ν:λ ) of the ν-th order statistics turn out to be of paramount importance for determining the convergence velocity ϕ. The expectation E ( Z λ:λ ) for the continuous normal case is identical to Rechenberg's progress coefficient c 1, λ , and the averages of the μ upper order statistics are known as the selection differential in the literature. For the case of an underlying normal distribution (as in evolution strategies) many of the results from order statistics can be utilized e.g. to determine the asymptotic behavior of an (1, λ)-strategy, while in the discrete case no such result is available. The order statistics approach turns out to be a very useful theoretical framework for the derivation of quite general results (including upper bounds) on the convergence velocity of evolutionary algorithms.

[1]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Numerical Optimization of Computer Models , 1982 .

[2]  Hans-Georg Beyer,et al.  Toward a Theory of Evolution Strategies: Some Asymptotical Results from the (1,+ )-Theory , 1993, Evolutionary Computation.

[3]  Schloss Birlinghoven,et al.  How Genetic Algorithms Really Work I.mutation and Hillclimbing , 2022 .

[4]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Optimal Mutation Rates in Genetic Search , 1993, ICGA.

[5]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  The Interaction of Mutation Rate, Selection, and Self-Adaptation Within a Genetic Algorithm , 1992, PPSN.

[6]  D. Farnsworth A First Course in Order Statistics , 1993 .

[7]  Ingo Rechenberg,et al.  Evolutionsstrategie : Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution , 1973 .

[8]  Ingo Rechenberg,et al.  The Evolution Strategy. A Mathematical Model of Darwinian Evolution , 1984 .

[9]  H. Harter Expected values of normal order statistics , 1961 .

[10]  Heinz Mühlenbein,et al.  How Genetic Algorithms Really Work: Mutation and Hillclimbing , 1992, PPSN.

[11]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization , 1993, Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  Heinz Mühlenbein,et al.  Predictive Models for the Breeder Genetic Algorithm I. Continuous Parameter Optimization , 1993, Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[14]  Stephanie Forrest,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms , 1993 .

[15]  Masayuki Yanagiya,et al.  A Simple Mutation-Dependent Genetic Algorithm , 1993, ICGA.

[16]  Reinhard Männer,et al.  Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2, PPSN-II, Brussels, Belgium, September 28-30, 1992 , 1992, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature.

[17]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolutionary Programming and Evolution Strategies: Similarities and Differences , 1993 .