Spontaneous visualization and concept evaluation

This paper proposes that customers often respond to brand extension concepts by visualizing the product. We call this process spontaneous visualization and suggest that it precedes concept evaluations. In two studies, we show that spontaneous visualization is enhanced by the fit between the parent brand and the extension category and by the ease with which the product category can be imagined. The appeal of the visualized image in turn determines whether visualization enhances or decreases concept evaluations. In addition, we find a stronger link between product evaluations and delayed choice when evaluations are based on visualization; evaluations based on visualization hence appear to be more “valid” in the sense of predicting subsequent behavior. Implications of these findings and ideas for future research are discussed.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[2]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  Cognition in learning and memory , 1974 .

[4]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  New Products : The Factors that Drive Success , 1994 .

[5]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[6]  C. Anderson.  Imagination and expectation: The effect of imagining behavioral scripts on personal influences. , 1983 .

[7]  Punam Anand Keller,et al.  Differences in the Relative Influence of Product Attributes Under Alternative Processing Conditions , 1994 .

[8]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as Mediators of Likelihood Estimates and Compliance: Does Imagining Make It So? , 1982 .

[9]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency , 1991 .

[10]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation , 1986 .

[11]  J. Carroll.  The Effect of Imagining an Event on Expectations for the Event: An Interpretation in Terms of the Availability Heuristic. , 1978 .

[12]  A. Paivio.  Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[13]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design , 1999 .

[14]  P. Bone,et al.  Measuring Communication-Evoked Imagery Processing , 1991 .

[15]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[16]  S. Reddy,et al.  The Impact of Brand Extension Introduction on Choice , 2001 .

[17]  Steve Hoeffler,et al.  Measuring Preferences for Really New Products , 2003 .

[18]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? , 1993 .

[19]  L. Barsalou.  Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts: Manifestations of a Compositional System of Perceptual Symbols , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[20]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Narrative-based representations of social knowledge: Their construction and use in comprehension, memory, and judgment , 2002 .

[21]  Richard W. Olshavsky,et al.  An Exploratory Study of the Innovation Evaluation Process , 1996 .

[22]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  The Predictive Power of Internet‐Based Product Concept Testing Using Visual Depiction and Animation , 2000 .

[23]  J. Richardson.  Concreteness, imagery, and semantic categorization , 1980 .

[24]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Conditions for a Picture-Superiority Effect on Consumer Memory , 1984 .

[25]  G. Bower,et al.  Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. , 1980 .

[26]  P. Bone,et al.  The Generation and Consequences of Communication-evoked Imagery , 1992 .

[27]  Punam Anand Keller,et al.  Differences in the relative influence of product attributes under alternative processing conditions: Attribute importance versus attribute ease of imagability , 1994 .

[28]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[29]  Susan M. Broniarczyk,et al.  The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension , 1994 .

[30]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments , 1984 .

[31]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[32]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Verbal versus realistic pictorial representations in conjoint analysis with design attributes , 1998 .

[33]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products , 1998 .

[34]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  Contingent Processes of Source Identification , 1997 .

[35]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .