Applicability of simple expressions for bridge system reliability assessment

The performance of a structural system can often be represented by a single limit state function based on probabilistic finite element analysis; in this case, the associated system reliability index can be computed by using first-order second-moment method (FOSM). This method is exact if both the load effects and the system resistance follow normal or lognormal distributions. However, the amount of error introduced can be significant when the random variables follow distributions other than normal or lognormal. In fact, it is reasonable to represent the maximum intensity of the live loads on bridge structures using extreme value distribution especially when supported by truck load survey data. In this paper, the amount of error associated with the simple expressions based on FOSM to compute system reliability index is investigated. The system reliability index, for a selected bridge superstructure under extreme value type I largest random live loads and lognormal system resistance, is computed for varying coefficients of variation and mean values of the load effect and the system resistance using the first order reliability method (FORM) and the simple expressions based on FOSM. The amount of error introduced by using these expressions instead of FORM is presented.

[1]  Fred Moses,et al.  System reliability developments in structural engineering , 1982 .

[2]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[3]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Time-dependent performance indicators of damaged bridge superstructures , 2011 .

[4]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Automated finite element updating using strain data for the lifetime reliability assessment of bridges , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Non-Normal Dependent Vectors in Structural Safety , 1981 .

[6]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Quadratic Limit States in Structural Reliability , 1979 .

[7]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[8]  Fred Moses,et al.  A sequential response surface method and its application in the reliability analysis of aircraft structural systems , 1994 .

[9]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability Concepts in Engineering: Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering , 2006 .

[10]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Redundancy and robustness of highway bridge superstructures and substructures , 2010, Structures and Infrastructure Systems.

[11]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  New light on first- and second-order reliability methods , 1987 .

[12]  Sanjay R. Arwade,et al.  Computational Analysis of Randomness in Structural Mechanics , 2011 .

[13]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  RELSYS: A computer program for structural system reliability , 1998 .

[14]  Michel Ghosn,et al.  REDUNDANCY IN HIGHWAY BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURES , 1998 .

[15]  I. R. Orisamolu,et al.  Consistent finite element discretization of distributed random loads , 1994 .

[16]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Advanced Modeling for Efficient Computation of Life-Cycle Performance Prediction and Service-Life Estimation of Bridges , 2010 .

[17]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[18]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Reliability, redundancy and risk as performance indicators of structural systems during their life-cycle , 2012 .