Unintended effects: varying icon spacing changes users' visual search strategy

Users of modern GUIs routinely engage in visual searches for various control items, such as buttons and icons. Because this is so ubiquitous, it is important that the visual properties of user interfaces support such searches. The current research is aimed at deepening our understanding of how the visual spacing between icons affects visual search times. We constructed an experiment based on previous icon sets [8] where spacing between icons was systematically manipulated, and for which we had a computational cognitive model that predicted performance. In particular, the model predicted that larger spacing would lead to slower search times. While this prediction was borne out, there was an unanticipated finding: users in this new experiment were substantially slower than in previous similar experiments with smaller spacing. In fact, results from this new experiment were better fit with a model that employed a fundamentally different, and less efficient, search strategy. A second experiment was conducted to explicitly test the surprising result that this varied and larger icon spacing would lead to increased search times. Results were consistent with this hypothesis. These results imply that while small differences in visual layout may not intrinsically produce large differences in user performance, they may cause users to adopt suboptimal strategies that do produce such differences.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Michael D. Fleetwood Computational modeling of icon search , 2002 .

[3]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Modeling the Visual Search of Displays : A Revised ACT-R / PM Model of Icon Search Based on Eye-Tracking and Experimental Data , 2003 .

[4]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Milliseconds Matter: an Introduction to Microstrategies and to Their Use in Describing and Predicting Interactive Behavior Milliseconds Matter: an Introduction to Microstrategies and to Their Use in Describing and Predicting Interactive Behavior , 2022 .

[6]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Using icons to find documents: simplicity is critical , 1993, INTERCHI.

[7]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Cognitive Architecture , 2003 .

[9]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies , 2001, TCHI.

[10]  H. Smallman,et al.  Segregation of basic colors in an information display. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[12]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Modeling icon search in ACT-R/PM , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[13]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Navigation strategies with ecological displays , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[16]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[17]  Dario D. Salvucci An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[18]  Nancy Staggers Impact of Screen Density on Clinical Nurses' Computer Task Performance and Subjective Screen Satisfaction , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..