A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners

AbstractPeople with transtibial amputation often experience skin breakdown due to the pressures and shear stresses that occur at the limb-socket interface. The purpose of this research was to create a transtibial finite element model (FEM) of a contemporary prosthesis that included complete socket geometry, two frictional interactions (limb-liner and liner-socket), and an elastomeric liner. Magnetic resonance imaging scans from three people with characteristic transtibial limb shapes (i.e., short-conical, long-conical, and cylindrical) were acquired and used to develop the models. Each model was evaluated with two loading profiles to identify locations of focused stresses during stance phase. The models identified five locations on the participants’ residual limbs where peak stresses matched locations of mechanically induced skin issues they experienced in the 9 months prior to being scanned. The peak contact pressure across all simulations was 98 kPa and the maximum resultant shear stress was 50 kPa, showing reasonable agreement with interface stress measurements reported in the literature. Future research could take advantage of the developed FEM to assess the influence of changes in limb volume or liner material properties on interface stress distributions. Graphical abstractResidual limb finite element model. Left: model components. Right: interface pressures during stance phase

[1]  Frank Baaijens,et al.  Pressure Induced Deep Tissue Injury Explained , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  J. Sanders,et al.  Effects of Fluid Insert Volume Changes on Socket Pressures and Shear Stresses: Case Studies from two Trans-Tibial Amputee Subjects , 2006, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[3]  D. Childress,et al.  Normal and shear stresses on a residual limb in a prosthetic socket during ambulation: comparison of finite element results with experimental measurements. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Per Aagaard,et al.  Mechanical properties of human patellar tendon at the hierarchical levels of tendon and fibril. , 2012, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  Xiaohong Jia,et al.  Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Jae Kap Jung,et al.  Evaluation of commercial current transformer comparator by using precise standard capacitors and resistors , 2010, CPEM 2010.

[7]  Chih-Han Chang,et al.  Effects of liner stiffness for trans-tibial prosthesis: a finite element contact model. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Edward S. Neumann,et al.  Regression Estimates of Pressure on Transtibial Residual Limbs Using Load Cell Measurements of the Forces and Moments Occurring at the Base of the Socket , 2013 .

[9]  A. Gefen,et al.  Internal mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of a residual limb of a trans-tibial amputee. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Effects of changes in cadence, prosthetic componentry, and time on interface pressures and shear stresses of three trans-tibial amputees. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  Xiaohong Jia,et al.  A quasi-dynamic nonlinear finite element model to investigate prosthetic interface stresses during walking for trans-tibial amputees. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  Natalie Vanicek,et al.  Gait patterns in transtibial amputee fallers vs. non-fallers: biomechanical differences during level walking. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[14]  Linda Resnik,et al.  Change From Statistical Error Lower-Limb Amputations : Distinguishing True Reliability of Outcome Measures for People With , 2011 .

[15]  P. Naylor EXPERIMENTAL FRICTION BLISTERS. , 1955, The British journal of dermatology.

[16]  J C H Goh,et al.  Development of an integrated CAD-FEA process for below-knee prosthetic sockets. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  Mario C Faustini,et al.  The quasi-static response of compliant prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees using finite element methods. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Jason M Wilken,et al.  Axial bone–socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads , 2016, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[19]  I. Siev-Ner,et al.  Surgical and Morphological Factors that Affect Internal Mechanical Loads in Soft Tissues of the Transtibial Residuum , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness? , 2012, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[21]  Hossein Gholizadeh,et al.  Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Anton Filatov,et al.  Static and cyclic performance evaluation of sensors for human interface pressure measurement , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Amputee socks: Sock thickness changes with normal use , 2016, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[24]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Development of Standardized Material Testing Protocols for Prosthetic Liners. , 2017, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  S. Gard,et al.  Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Comparison of hexahedral and tetrahedral elements in finite element analysis of the foot and footwear. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Using computational simulation to aid in the prediction of socket fit: a preliminary study. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  Krittika D’Silva,et al.  Self-reported prosthetic sock use among persons with transtibial amputation , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[29]  Dan L. Bader,et al.  The importance of internal strain as opposed to interface pressure in the prevention of pressure related deep tissue injury. , 2010, Journal of tissue viability.

[30]  C H Daly,et al.  Age-related changes in the mechanical properties of human skin. , 1979, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[31]  G D Reiber,et al.  Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  Jason P Carey,et al.  The effect of biomechanical variables on force sensitive resistor error: Implications for calibration and improved accuracy. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Steven B. Hoath,et al.  Amputee skin condition: occlusion, stratum corneum hydration and free amino acid levels , 2011, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[34]  Wylie Cm Late survival following cerebrovascular accidents. , 1962 .

[35]  Pieter U Dijkstra,et al.  Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  Jan H B Geertzen,et al.  Skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees: 2. Influence on functioning in daily life. , 2011, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[37]  Jason M Wilken,et al.  A comparison of limb-socket kinematics of bone-bridging and non-bone-bridging wartime transtibial amputations. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  Gabi Nehme,et al.  Impact of Pressure Distribution on the Relief Areas of Prosthetic Sockets for Transtibial Amputees Using Design of Experiment and Finite Element Analysis , 2011 .

[39]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[40]  D S Childress,et al.  A review of prosthetic interface stress investigations. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[41]  D G Smith,et al.  Transtibial amputations. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  Nicolas Vuillerme,et al.  Biomechanics and physiological parameters during gait in lower-limb amputees: a systematic review. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[43]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Changes in interface pressures and shear stresses over time on trans-tibial amputee subjects ambulating with prosthetic limbs: comparison of diurnal and six-month differences. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Finite element estimates of interface stress in the trans-tibial prosthesis using gap elements are different from those using automated contact. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  Cross-validation of a portable, six-degree-of-freedom load cell for use in lower-limb prosthetics research. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  C. Daly Biomechanical properties of dermis. , 1982, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[47]  C H Daly,et al.  Interface pressures and shear stresses: Sagittal plane angular alignment effects in three trans-tibial amputee case studies , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[48]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Elastomeric liners for people with transtibial amputation: Survey of prosthetists’ clinical practices , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[49]  Prasanna Kumar Lenka,et al.  Analysis of trans tibial prosthetic socket materials using finite element method , 2011 .

[50]  J. Sanders,et al.  Skin response to repetitive mechanical stress: a new experimental model in pig. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[51]  V. C. Roberts,et al.  Development of a non-linear finite element modelling of the below-knee prosthetic socket interface. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[52]  Keren Fisher,et al.  Prosthetic socket fit comfort score , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[53]  M. Zhang,et al.  Comparison of computational analysis with clinical measurement of stresses on below-knee residual limb in a prosthetic socket. , 2000, Medical engineering & physics.

[54]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Technical note: Computer-manufactured inserts for prosthetic sockets. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[55]  Joakim Schön,et al.  Coefficient of friction for aluminum in contact with a carbon fiber epoxy composite , 2004 .

[56]  Brian J Hafner,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications. , 2016, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[57]  Edward S. Neumann,et al.  Use of a Load Cell and Force-Moment Analysis to Examine Transtibial Prosthesis Foot Rollover Kinetics for Anterior-Posterior Alignment Perturbations , 2012 .

[58]  J E Sanders,et al.  Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[59]  W. Lee,et al.  Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb--dynamic effects. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[60]  J. Sanders,et al.  Clinical study: Changes in interface pressure and stump shape over time: Preliminary results from a transtibial amputee subject , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[61]  B. Mcenaney,et al.  Effects of fibre orientation on the tribology of a model carbon–carbon composite , 2001 .

[62]  Jan H B Geertzen,et al.  University of Groningen Skin Problems of the Stump in Lower Limb Amputees Meulenbelt, , 2011 .

[63]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Preliminary investigation of residual-limb fluid volume changes within one day. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.