Cost-competitiveness of organic photovoltaics for electricity self-consumption at residential buildings: A comparative study of Denmark and Greece under real market conditions

Abstract To address sustainability challenges, photovoltaics (PV) are regarded as a promising renewable energy technology. Decreasing PV module costs and increasing residential electricity prices have made self-consumption of PV-generated electricity financially more attractive than exporting to the grid. Organic photovoltaics (OPV) are an emerging thin-film PV technology that shows promise of greatly improving the environmental and economic performances of PV technologies. Previous studies have estimated the current and future costs of OPV technologies, but the attractiveness of investing in OPV systems has not been evaluated under real market conditions, especially under PV self-consumption schemes. In this study, we investigate the self-consumption of electricity generation from conventional and organic PV systems installed at residential houses in two different countries, Denmark and Greece, under current PV regulatory frameworks. We then focus on modelling and assessing the cost-competitiveness of organic PV technologies based on cost estimations for existing pilot-scale (kW-range), and projected scale-up (100MW) and industrial-scale (100 GW) manufacturing capacity levels. Our generic results applying to all PV technologies show that PV systems installed at residential houses in Greece perform economically better than those in Denmark do in terms of self-sufficiency and gross electricity bill savings (i.e. excluding PV costs). Using the two country cases, which present very different settings, we characterise and discuss the influence of three key parameters of the economic performance of PV systems, namely the PV regulatory scheme, the solar irradiation level and the temporal match between the electricity consumption and solar irradiation profiles. Focusing on organic PV systems developed in an industrial-scale cost setting (1.53 €/Wp), we find that they deliver significant electricity bill savings for residential houses in Greece (38%) under current conditions, while they may not be sufficiently attractive for residential houses in Denmark (6.5%) due to mainly the different PV regulatory schemes. Based on these findings, we therefore recommend investors interested in renewable energy technologies to pursue scaling up the manufacturing capacity of OPV technologies, as well as assess a large number of countries to identify and prioritise financially attractive settings for PV self-consumption.

[1]  Shijun Jia,et al.  Polymer–Fullerene Bulk‐Heterojunction Solar Cells , 2009, Advanced materials.

[2]  Volker Quaschning,et al.  Sizing of Residential PV Battery Systems , 2014 .

[3]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings : A review , 2015 .

[4]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Ex‐ante environmental and economic evaluation of polymer photovoltaics , 2009 .

[5]  Morteza Eslamian,et al.  Progress in emerging solution-processed thin film solar cells – Part II: Perovskite solar cells , 2016 .

[6]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Methodology Guidelines on Life Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaic Electricity 3rd Edition , 2016 .

[7]  Future development promise for plastic‐based solar electricity , 2016 .

[8]  Erin Baker,et al.  Estimating the manufacturing cost of purely organic solar cells , 2009 .

[9]  Amanullah M. T. Oo,et al.  Comprehensive economic evaluations of a residential building with solar photovoltaic and battery energy storage systems: An Australian case study , 2017 .

[10]  Theofilos A. Papadopoulos,et al.  A Model for the Assessment of Different Net-Metering Policies , 2016 .

[11]  Y. Lawryshyn,et al.  Using stochastic models to determine financial indicators and technical objectives for organic solar cells , 2012 .

[12]  Mikkel Jørgensen,et al.  Cost analysis of roll-to-roll fabricated ITO free single and tandem organic solar modules based on data from manufacture , 2014 .

[13]  Michael P. Tsang,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of cradle-to-grave opportunities and environmental impacts of organic photovoltaic solar panels compared to conventional technologies , 2016 .

[14]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment of Solar Charger with Integrated Organic Photovoltaics , 2017 .

[15]  Robert L. Jaffe,et al.  Pathways for solar photovoltaics , 2015 .

[16]  Jutta Geldermann,et al.  What drives the profitability of household PV investments, self-consumption and self-sufficiency? , 2017 .

[17]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Ecodesign of organic photovoltaic modules from Danish and Chinese perspectives , 2015 .

[18]  Xiaojing Zhou,et al.  A projection of commercial-scale organic photovoltaic module costs , 2014 .

[19]  Ajay Gambhir,et al.  The future costs of OPV – A bottom-up model of material and manufacturing costs with uncertainty analysis , 2016 .

[20]  Sami Kara,et al.  Renewable energy integration into factories: Real-time control of on-site energy systems , 2015 .

[21]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  Smart residential energy scheduling utilizing two stage Mixed Integer Linear Programming , 2015, 2015 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[22]  Hendrik Kondziella,et al.  Assessing the influence of the temporal resolution of electrical load and PV generation profiles on self-consumption and sizing of PV-battery systems , 2016 .

[23]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  The residential electricity sector in Denmark: A description of current conditions , 2016 .

[24]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Economic assessment of solar electricity production from organic-based photovoltaic modules in a domestic environment , 2011 .

[25]  Christos Christodoulou,et al.  Evolution of PV systems in Greece and review of applicable solutions for higher penetration levels , 2017 .

[26]  Cara J. Mulligan,et al.  Levelised cost of electricity for organic photovoltaics , 2015 .

[27]  F. M. Andersen,et al.  Long term forecasting of hourly electricity consumption in local areas in Denmark , 2013 .

[28]  S. Quoilin,et al.  Quantifying self-consumption linked to solar home battery systems: Statistical analysis and economic assessment , 2016 .

[29]  Kim Bjarne Wittchen,et al.  - Reference Climate Dataset for Technical Dimensioning in Building, Construction and other Sectors , 2013 .

[30]  Bastien Girod,et al.  Profitability in absence of subsidies: A techno-economic analysis of rooftop photovoltaic self-consumption in residential and commercial buildings , 2016 .

[31]  Mikkel Jørgensen,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: Rise to Power – OPV‐Based Solar Parks , 2014, Advanced materials.

[32]  A. Audenaert,et al.  Comparison of support policies for residential photovoltaic systems in the major EU markets through investment profitability , 2016 .

[33]  Esfandyar Mazhari,et al.  Integrated analysis of high-penetration PV and PHEV with energy storage and demand response , 2013 .

[34]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Environmental impacts of electricity self-consumption from organic photovoltaic battery systems at industrial facilities in Denmark , 2017 .

[35]  Yuri Lawryshyn,et al.  A model to determine financial indicators for organic solar cells , 2009 .

[36]  Bakhtyar Hoseinzadeh,et al.  A theoretical bilevel control scheme for power networks with large-scale penetration of distributed renewable resources , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT).

[37]  F. Krebs Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A review of printing and coating techniques , 2009 .

[38]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Solar photovoltaic-battery systems in Swedish households – Self-consumption and self-sufficiency , 2016 .