In-vehicle display HMI safety evaluation using a driving simulator

Recently, telematics services and in-vehicle display devices such as the CNS (Car Navigation System) have become new causes of traffic accidents. These accidents are caused by ‘Inattention’ from the increase of the driver’s mental workload while he/she is driving. The driver of a vehicle (except for emergency or police vehicles) must not use a hand-held mobile phone while the vehicle is moving. To address this problem, Australia, England, Italy, Brazil and some states in the US have banned the use of hand-held mobile devices during driving. However, there are no restrictions on the use of in-vehicle displays or on the display’s positions. The position of a navigation system in a vehicle should be assessed objectively, and the effect of the position on the driver’s attention should be studied. Some existing research reports that in-vehicle distraction not only leads to reduced speeds and more frequent lane switching, but also more gazing by the driver to the centre of the road. In this study, to develop an assessment method and to propose the proper position of a CNS, an experiment is carried out in a driving simulator environment. Different methods to track the gaze and physical parameters of the driver are used for HMI (Human-Machine Interface) assessment. The experiment is carried out in a driving simulator to observe the glancing distribution during driving according to the position of the navigation system. Fourteen subjects participated in this experiment. Changes in subjects’ physiological signals and glancing distribution rates were collected.

[1]  Hyun-Jun Kim,et al.  Development of the GPS Simulator for Driving Simulators , 2006, 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference.

[2]  Jung Hwan Lee,et al.  An Experimental Study on the Driver Workload of Telematics Service , 2006 .

[3]  Paul Milgram,et al.  An Investigation of Attentional Demand in a Simulated Driving Environment , 2000 .

[4]  Soo-Young Lee,et al.  Development and Evaluation of ITS Devices Using KAAS(KATECH Advanced Automotive Simulator) System , 2006, 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference.

[5]  Tsutomu Asoh,et al.  *JAMA Guideline for In-Vehicle Display Systems (*Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association) , 2005 .

[6]  A. Craig,et al.  A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Toshihiro Wakita,et al.  Voice Information System that Adapts to Driver ' s Mental Workload , 2004 .

[8]  Wan-Suk Yoo,et al.  Analysis of Perceptual , Cognitive, and Motoral Characteristics and their Effects on Driving Performance , 1999 .

[9]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Evaluating the human-machine interface to vehicle navigation systems as an example of ubiquitous computing , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Human Factors Methods , 2013 .

[11]  Myung-Won Suh,et al.  OVERVIEW OF TELEMATICS: A SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE APPROACH , 2006 .

[12]  Hiroshi Uno,et al.  Effects of auditory distractions on driving behavior during lane change course negotiation: estimation of spare mental capacity as a index of attention distraction , 2000 .