Schema design and implementation of the grasp-related mirror neuron system

Abstract. Mirror neurons within a monkey's premotor area F5 fire not only when the monkey performs a certain class of actions but also when the monkey observes another monkey (or the experimenter) perform a similar action. It has thus been argued that these neurons are crucial for understanding of actions by others. We offer the hand-state hypothesis as a new explanation of the evolution of this capability: the basic functionality of the F5 mirror system is to elaborate the appropriate feedback – what we call the hand state– for opposition-space based control of manual grasping of an object. Given this functionality, the social role of the F5 mirror system in understanding the actions of others may be seen as an exaptation gained by generalizing from one's own hand to an other's hand. In other words, mirror neurons first evolved to augment the “canonical” F5 neurons (active during self-movement based on observation of an object) by providing visual feedback on “hand state,” relating the shape of the hand to the shape of the object. We then introduce the MNS1 (mirror neuron system 1) model of F5 and related brain regions. The existing Fagg–Arbib–Rizzolatti–Sakata model represents circuitry for visually guided grasping of objects, linking the anterior intraparietal area (AIP) with F5 canonical neurons. The MNS1 model extends the AIP visual pathway by also modeling pathways, directed toward F5 mirror neurons, which match arm–hand trajectories to the affordances and location of a potential target object. We present the basic schemas for the MNS1 model, then aggregate them into three “grand schemas”– visual analysis of hand state, reach and grasp, and the core mirror circuit – for each of which we present a useful implementation (a non-neural visual processing system, a multijoint 3-D kinematics simulator, and a learning neural network, respectively). With this implementation we show how the mirror system may learnto recognize actions already in the repertoire of the F5 canonical neurons. We show that the connectivity pattern of mirror neuron circuitry can be established through training, and that the resultant network can exhibit a range of novel, physiologically interesting behaviors during the process of action recognition. We train the system on the basis of final grasp but then observe the whole time course of mirror neuron activity, yielding predictions for neurophysiological experiments under conditions of spatial perturbation, altered kinematics, and ambiguous grasp execution which highlight the importance of the timingof mirror neuron activity.

[1]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[2]  J. Douglas Faires,et al.  Numerical Analysis , 1981 .

[3]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control , 1981 .

[4]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Andersen,et al.  Callosal and prefrontal associational projecting cell populations in area 7A of the macaque monkey: A study using retrogradely transported fluorescent dyes , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Afferent and efferent projections of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Vision and Action: The Control of Grasping , 1990 .

[12]  W. Cheney,et al.  Numerical Analysis: Mathematics of Scientific Computing , 1991 .

[13]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[14]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Fitting Parameterized Three-Dimensional Models to Images , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision , 1993, Springer US.

[18]  H. Sakata,et al.  Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  J H Maunsell,et al.  The Brain's Visual World: Representation of Visual Targets in Cerebral Cortex , 1995, Science.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  G. Inbar,et al.  A model for learning human reaching-movements , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  H. Sakata,et al.  The TINS Lecture The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M. Arbib,et al.  Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics , 1997 .

[27]  Eun-Jung Holden,et al.  Visual recognition of hand motion , 1997 .

[28]  Gideon F. Inbar,et al.  A model for learning human reaching movements , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping , 1998, Neural Networks.

[30]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  S. Squatrito,et al.  Corticocortical connections between frontal periarcuate regions and visual areas of the superior temporal sulcus and the adjoining inferior parietal lobule in the macaque monkey , 1998, Brain Research.

[32]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Grasping objects and grasping action meanings: the dual role of monkey rostroventral premotor cortex (area F5). , 1998, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[34]  Thierry Carron,et al.  Symbolic fusion of luminance-hue-chroma features for region segmentation , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[35]  A. Murata,et al.  Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4) , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  The Mirror System, Imitation, and the Evolution of Language , 1999 .

[37]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Coordination of reaching and grasping by capitalizing on obstacle avoidance and other constraints , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  K. Zilles,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system , 2000, Anatomy and Embryology.

[40]  Alice C. Roy,et al.  Hand kinematics during reaching and grasping in the macaque monkey , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[41]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Corticocortical connections of visual, sensorimotor, and multimodal processing areas in the parietal lobe of the macaque monkey , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[42]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  End-point constraints in aiming movements: effects of approach angle and speed , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[43]  S. Vogt,et al.  Multijoint grasping movements. Simulated and observed effects of object location, object size, and initial aperture. , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[44]  S. Vogt,et al.  Multijoint grasping movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  M. Arbib The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language , 2002 .

[46]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Neural homologies: principles, databases and modeling , 2002 .

[47]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Imitation in Animals and Artifacts , 2002 .

[48]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[49]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  M. Kawato,et al.  A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.