Three-dimensional dynamic in vivo motion of the cervical spine: assessment of measurement accuracy and preliminary findings.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Previous research has quantified cervical spine motion with conventional measurement techniques (eg, cadaveric studies, motion capture systems, and fluoroscopy), but these techniques were not designed to accurately measure three-dimensional (3D) dynamic cervical spine motion under in vivo conditions. PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to characterize the accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring 3D dynamic cervical spine kinematics and to demonstrate its in vivo application. STUDY DESIGN Through accuracy assessment and application of technique, in vivo cervical spine motion was measured. METHODS The accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring cervical spine motion was determined in an in vitro experiment. Tantalum beads were implanted into the vertebrae of an ovine specimen, and biplane X-ray images were acquired as the specimen's neck was manually moved through neck extension and axial neck rotation. The 3D position and orientation of each cervical vertebra were determined from the biplane X-ray images using model-based tracking. For comparison, the position and orientation of each vertebra were also determined by tracking the position of the implanted beads with dynamic radiostereometric analysis. To demonstrate in vivo application of this technique, biplane X-ray images were acquired as a human subject performed two motion tasks: neck extension and axial neck rotation. The positions and orientations of each cervical vertebra were determined with model-based tracking. Cervical spine motion was reported with standard kinematic descriptions of translation and rotation. RESULTS The in vitro validation demonstrated that model-based tracking is accurate to within +/-0.6 mm and +/-0.6 degrees for measuring cervical spine motion. For the in vivo application, there were significant rotations about all three anatomical axes for both the neck extension and axial neck rotation motion tasks. CONCLUSIONS Model-based tracking is an accurate technique for measuring in vivo, 3D, dynamic cervical spine motion. Preliminary data acquired using this technique are in agreement with previous studies. It is anticipated that this experimental approach will enhance our understanding of cervical spine motion under normal and pathologic conditions.

[1]  Bhalla Sk,et al.  Normal ranges of intervertebral-joint motion of the cervical spine. , 1969 .

[2]  R. Lin,et al.  Characteristics of Sagittal Vertebral Alignment in Flexion Determined by Dynamic Radiographs of the Cervical Spine , 2001, Spine.

[3]  L Penning,et al.  Rotation of the Cervical Spine: A CT Study in Normal Subjects , 1987, Spine.

[4]  Andrew Holmes,et al.  The Range and Nature of Flexion‐Extension Motion in the Cervical Spine , 1994, Spine.

[5]  A. Nordwall,et al.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  S.A. Banks,et al.  Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Gang Li,et al.  Measurement of Vertebral Kinematics Using Noninvasive Image Matching Method–Validation and Application , 2008, Spine.

[8]  A. Aho,et al.  Segmentary antero-posterior mobility of the cervical spine. , 1955, Annales medicinae internae Fenniae.

[9]  Dewey Odhner,et al.  CT Imaging Techniques for Describing Motions of the Cervicothoracic Junction and Cervical Spine During Flexion, Extension, and Cervical Traction , 2006, Spine.

[10]  D T Davy,et al.  A Kinematic Study of the Cervical Spine Before and After Segmental Arthrodesis , 1998, Spine.

[11]  Alessandro Bozzao,et al.  Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages , 2009, Neurosurgical Review.

[12]  Ray Vanderby,et al.  A Method to Measure Cervical Spine Motion Over Extended Periods of Time , 2007, Spine.

[13]  Mohamed R. Mahfouz,et al.  In Vivo Evaluation of Dynamic Characteristics of the Normal, Fused, and Disc Replacement Cervical Spines , 2007, Spine.

[14]  Masashi Miyazaki,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of the Relationship Between the Grade of Disc Degeneration and Motion Unit of the Cervical Spine , 2008, Spine.

[15]  R Zehnder,et al.  CT - Functional Diagnostics of the Rotatory Instability of the Upper Cervical Spine: Part 2. An Evaluation on Healthy Adults and Patients with Suspected Instability , 1987, Spine.

[16]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Accuracy of biplane x-ray imaging combined with model-based tracking for measuring in-vivo patellofemoral joint motion , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[17]  Masashi Miyazaki,et al.  The Effects of the Degenerative Changes in the Functional Spinal Unit on the Kinematics of the Cervical Spine , 2008, Spine.

[18]  Scott Tashman,et al.  In-vivo measurement of dynamic joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and CT: application to canine ACL deficiency. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Validation of three-dimensional model-based tibio-femoral tracking during running. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Functional Radiographic Diagnosis of the Cervical Spine: Flexion/Extension , 1988, Spine.

[21]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Kinematics of the Cervical Spine in Lateral Bending: In Vivo Three-Dimensional Analysis , 2006, Spine.

[22]  J. Dvorak,et al.  In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  E. Culham,et al.  The Effect of Initial Head Position on Active Cervical Axial Rotation Range of Motion in Two Age Populations , 1996, Spine.

[24]  H. Baba,et al.  Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. , 1993, Spine.

[25]  Satoshi Hamai,et al.  Can magnetic resonance imaging–derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single‐plane three‐dimensional shape registration? , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Yoshinobu Sato,et al.  Kinematics of the Upper Cervical Spine in Rotation: In Vivo Three-Dimensional Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[28]  Scott Tashman,et al.  A technique to measure three-dimensional in vivo rotation of fused and adjacent lumbar vertebrae. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[29]  T. Tamaki,et al.  Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of the Cervical Spine with Special Reference to the Axial Rotation , 1989, Spine.

[30]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Development of a System for In Vitro Neck Muscle Force Replication in Whole Cervical Spine Experiments , 2001, Spine.

[31]  I. Stokes Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. , 1994, Spine.

[32]  L. Penning Normal movements of the cervical spine. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.