Dynamic emergy evaluation of a fish farm rearing process.

The environmental sustainability of a fish farm rearing process was examined by means of emergy analysis. Many emergy analyses integrate data for a whole year smoothing short term variations and sometimes losing meaningful information (aliasing). For this reason we developed a model for an instantaneous emergy evaluation in an aquacultural system so that transformities, efficiency and effort spent at each moment during the fish rearing activity could be calculated. By means of the model and dynamic emergy calculations it is possible to recognize step by step the importance of the various emergy contributions and verify where and when to modify the system to move toward optimum production of a sustainable product. By the application of the model we confirmed that the emergy trends in a fish farm installation follow wide oscillations during a year due to variations in both internal and external emergy contributions. Among the fluxes considered, those due to the introduction of fingerlings represented the highest contributions to the total emergy budget. Thus, to improve the sustainability of the analyzed system the amount, frequency and timing of these fluxes must be carefully considered. For this purpose, a comparison between two different fry introduction schedules was performed to evaluate differences in the efficiency of the rearing process.

[1]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society for the Twenty-First Century: The Hierarchy of Energy , 2007 .

[2]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  The Energetic Basis for Valuation of Ecosystem Services , 2000, Ecosystems.

[3]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy) , 2001 .

[4]  Carl Folke,et al.  The role of ecosystems for a sustainable development of aquaculture , 1989 .

[5]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Ethanol production from biomass: Analysis of process efficiency and sustainability. , 1996 .

[6]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy and ecosystem complexity , 2009 .

[7]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems , 1998 .

[9]  I. Lupatsch,et al.  Predicting aquaculture waste from gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) culture using a nutritional approach , 1998 .

[10]  Nils S. Peterson,et al.  Simulation and evaluation with energy systems blocks , 1996 .

[11]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Dynamic emergy accounting for assessing the environmental benefits of subtropical wetland stormwater management systems , 2006 .

[12]  S. Jørgensen.  Handbook of Ecological Parameters and Ecotoxicology , 1991 .

[13]  M. Osman,et al.  Growth, Survival and Feed Conversion Rates of Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) Cultured in Earthen Brackish Water Ponds Fed Different Feed Types , 2004, Aquaculture International.

[14]  N Marchettini,et al.  An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies. , 2007, Waste management.

[15]  P. Nilsson.  Environmental Accounting—EMERGY and Environmental Decision Making , 1997, Forest Science.

[16]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Emergy Evaluation of Salmon Pen Culture , 2001 .

[17]  S. Bastianoni.  Use of Thermodynamic Orientors to Assess the Efficiency of Ecosystems: A Case Study in the Lagoon of Venice , 2002, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[18]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems , 2006 .

[19]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy analysis for the environmental sustainability of an inshore fish farming system , 2007 .

[20]  G. R. Brundtland.  Our Common Future World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987 .