Optimal design alternatives of advance guide signs of closely spaced exit ramps on urban expressways.

Advance guide signs for exit ramps along urban expressways are increasingly critical, enhancing safety and mobility by improving the flow of vehicles exiting urban expressways. However, research has devoted scant attention to advance guide signs for exit ramps. This study aimed to identify and propose optimal design alternatives for exit ramp advance guide signs for different types of exit spacing. This study conducted a driving simulation experiment consisting of five design alternatives of advance guide signs and two exit ramp spacing variation. Eight indicators were measured. The repeated-measure analysis of variances (ANOVA) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) were performed for the influence analysis and efficiency evaluation of different schemes. Influence analysis results showed better design alternatives in five schemes of advance guide signs, enabling drivers to more easily locate destination exits and change lanes fewer times, in addition to reducing drivers' need to decelerate, and improving traffic flow in the key influence range of destination exit ramps. The percentage of drivers successfully locating the destination exits also increased with optimal design alternatives of advance guide signs. When the exit ramp spacing tightened, on the other hand, drivers had to make more lane changes and accelerate and decelerate more frequently in the key influence range. As a result, a lower percentage of drivers successfully located destination exits. Efficiency evaluation results were also obtained. In tight spacing, three advance guide signs are recommended to be placed at 1 km, 0.5 km and 0 km prior to the beginning of the tapered deceleration lane. If conditions are limited, at least two advance guide signs should be used. With greater spacing, four advance guide signs are recommended, located at 2 km, 1 km, 0.5 km, and 0 km prior to the beginning of the tapered deceleration lane. If road conditions are limited, three advance guide signs should be used.

[1]  Jian Rong,et al.  Driver's Visual Cognition Behaviors of Traffic Signs Based on Eye Movement Parameters , 2011 .

[2]  Chang-Jen Lan,et al.  A Supplement to Advance Guide Sign Placement Guidelines in MUTCD , 2006 .

[3]  Jian Lu,et al.  The Technology of Road Guide Signs Setting in Large Interchanges , 2013 .

[4]  Joseph E. Hummer.  SUPPLEMENTAL INTERCHANGE SIGNING AND DRIVER CONTROL BEHAVIOR , 1989 .

[5]  Marcus A Brewer,et al.  Driver Comprehension of Diagrammatic Freeway Guide Signs , 2007 .

[6]  Samuel G Charlton,et al.  The role of attention in horizontal curves: a comparison of advance warning, delineation, and road marking treatments. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Guide Signing for Two-Lane Exits with an Option Lane: Evaluation of Human Factors , 2005 .

[8]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speed research. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Richard Andrew Somers.  An evaluation of guide signing at right multilane freeway exits with optional lanes , 1995 .

[10]  K N Womack,et al.  STUDY OF URBAN GUIDE SIGN DEFICIENCIES , 1992 .

[11]  Zhongyin Guo,et al.  The Expressway Traffic Sign Information Volume Threshold and AGS Position Based on Driving Behaviour , 2016 .

[12]  Thomas Schnell,et al.  Viewing Ground-Mounted Diagrammatic Guide Signs Before Entrance Ramps at Night: Driver Eye Scanning Behavior , 2003 .

[13]  S. Chow,et al.  Sample Size Calculations In Clinical Research , 2007 .

[14]  Helmut T. Zwahlen,et al.  Effectiveness of Ground-Mounted Diagrammatic Advance Guide Signs for Freeway Entrance Ramps , 2003 .

[15]  Chao Deng,et al.  Driver’s Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign Information Exposure in Complex Environments: A Case Study of the Highways in China , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  Jian Rong,et al.  Experimental research on the effectiveness of speed reduction markings based on driving simulation: a case study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Drivers’ Understanding of Overhead Freeway Exit Guide Signs: Evaluation of Alternatives with an Advanced Fixed-Base Driving Simulator , 2002 .

[18]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Driver distraction and performance effects of highway logo sign design. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Fengxiang Qiao,et al.  Using Driving Simulator for Advance Placement of Guide Sign Design for Exits along Highways , 2007 .

[20]  Donald A. Gordon.  The Assessment of Guide Sign Informational Load , 1981 .

[21]  Yung-Ching Liu.  A simulated study on the effects of information volume on traffic signs, viewing strategies and sign familiarity upon driver's visual search performance , 2005 .

[22]  Philip M. Garvey,et al.  A Proportion Based Format System for Freeway and Expressway Guide Signs , 2007 .

[23]  Jian John Lu,et al.  Safety and operational performance evaluation of four types of exit ramps on Florida's freeways (final report). , 2010 .

[24]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Driving Simulator Study of Signing for Complex Interchanges , 2013 .

[25]  Thomas Schnell,et al.  Effect of Luminance and Text Size on Information Acquisition Time from Traffic Signs , 2009 .