Ring Avulsion Replantation by Extended Debridement of the Avulsed Digital Artery and Interposition With Long Venous Grafts

Ring avulsion replantation is a technically challenging procedure with a very low success rate. Because the zone of arterial injury is more extensive than what it appears to be in such avulsion amputations, a technique was developed to debride the avulsed digital artery for a long distance, extending well into the digital pulp, thereby creating healthy arterial ends to be bridged by one or two segments of long venous grafts. Using this technical approach, 7 patients with complete amputations of ring avulsion injury (Urbaniak’s class III) were operated. In all amputations the bone was disrupted at the distal interphalangeal level (except in 1 patient) and the soft tissues at the proximal phalanx level, with the proximal interphalangeal joint and the flexor digitorum superficialis tendons being intact. Results indicated that replantation was successful in all patients. However, 2 patients presented with unusually late arterial failure 28 and 30 days after surgery respectively. Although one of these cases was salvaged by reoperation, the other case (followed by conservative management) demonstrated partial distal necrosis. Therefore, the ultimate success rate in this series was 85% in the long term. At follow-up, sensibility was protective in all patients, with an average static two-point discrimination of 7.8 mm (range, 6–14 mm). The total active motion of the replanted digits was 194 deg on average (range, 155–205 deg) without loss of function of the proximal interphalangeal joint except in 2 patients who had late vascular problems. The authors conclude that microsurgical replantation of completely amputated ring avulsion injuries with an intact proximal interphalangeal joint and flexor digitorum superficialis tendon, is a worthwhile procedure that results in good functional and aesthetic results. Furthermore, using an aggressive approach for debridement of the avulsed digital artery, as described in this article, an experienced microsurgeon can replant successfully nearly all cases. However, one should be cautious in the follow-up of such patients, because late arterial failure may be encountered, as was observed in 2 patients in this series. The authors suggest immediate reoperation in such unusual circumstances.

[1]  A. Keçi̇k,et al.  Fingertip Replantation at or Distal to the Nail Base: Use of the Technique of Artery-Only Anastomosis , 2001, Annals of plastic surgery.

[2]  J. May,et al.  Late Digital Replantation Failure: Pathophysiology and Risk Factors , 1998, Annals of Plastic Surgery.

[3]  R. Adani,et al.  Replantation of Degloved Skin of the Hand , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  S. Han,et al.  Fingertip Replantations: Clinical Evaluation of 135 Digits , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  D. Staffenberg,et al.  Replantation of Ring Avulsion of Index, Long, and Ring Fingers , 1996, Annals of plastic surgery.

[6]  R. Adani,et al.  Ring avulsion injuries: microsurgical management. , 1996, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[7]  H. Chen,et al.  Salvage of a devascularized digit with free arterialized venous flap: a case report. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  K. Malizos,et al.  Microsurgical treatment of ring avulsion injuries , 1994, Microsurgery.

[9]  R. Khouri,et al.  Salvage in a case of ring avulsion injury with an immediate second-toe wrap-around flap. , 1992, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  D. McGeorge,et al.  The Management of the Complete Ring Avulsion Injury , 1991, Journal of hand surgery.

[11]  J. Barrie,et al.  A new technique in the management of the ring avulsion injury. , 1991, Injury.

[12]  Y. Hirasé,et al.  Secondary reconstruction by temporoparietal free fascial flap for ring avulsion injury. , 1990, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  D. Martin,et al.  Use of a reverse cross-finger flap as a vascularized vein graft carrier in ring avulsion injuries. , 1990, Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume.

[14]  G. Frykman,et al.  A new class of ring avulsion injuries. , 1989, The Journal of hand surgery.

[15]  J. Werntz,et al.  Ring avulsion injuries: classification and prognosis. , 1989, The Journal of hand surgery.

[16]  S. Hovius,et al.  Results of Treatment of 48 Ring Avulsion Injuries , 1988, Annals of Plastic Surgery.

[17]  G. Foucher TECHNIQUE OF RING INJURIES REPLANTATION , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  J. Kutz,et al.  Venous flaps in digital revascularization and replantation. , 1987, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[19]  Y. Yamano Replantation of the amputated distal part of the fingers. , 1985, The Journal of hand surgery.

[20]  M. Nissenbaum Class IIA ring avulsion injuries: an absolute indication for microvascular repair. , 1984, The Journal of hand surgery.

[21]  H. Kleinert,et al.  Primary microsurgical repair of ring avulsion amputation injuries. , 1984, The Journal of hand surgery.

[22]  W. Kleinman,et al.  Preservation of function following complete degloving injuries to the hand: use of simultaneous groin flap, random abdominal flap, and partial-thickness skin graft. , 1981, The Journal of hand surgery.

[23]  D. S. Bright,et al.  Microvascular management of ring avulsion injuries. , 1981, The Journal of hand surgery.

[24]  T. Krizek,et al.  Ring avulsion injury. , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  T. Tajima Treatment of open crushing type of industrial injuries of the hand and forearm: degloving, open circumferential, heat-press, and nail-bed injuries. , 1974, The Journal of trauma.

[26]  I. McGregor Degloving injuries. , 1970, The Hand.

[27]  Bevin Ag,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF RING AVULSION INJURIES AND ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS IN THE HAND. , 1963 .

[28]  R. Chase,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF RING AVULSION INJURIES AND ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS IN THE HAND , 1963, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[29]  J. Bakhach,et al.  Replantation , 1872, The American journal of dental science.