The Effects of Headcut and Knickpoint Propagation on Bridges in Iowa

The overarching goal of the proposed research was to provide a predictive tool for knickpoint propagation within the HCA (Hungry Canyon Alliance) territory. Knickpoints threaten the stability of bridge structures in Western Iowa. The study involved detailed field investigations over two years in order to monitor the upstream migration of a knickpoint on Mud Creek in Mills County, IA and identify the key mechanisms triggering knickpoint propagation. A state-of-the-art laser level system mounted on a movable truss provided continuous measurements of the knickpoint front for different flow conditions. A pressure transducer found in proximity of the truss provided simultaneous measurements of the flow depth. The laser and pressure transducer measurements led to the identification of the conditions at which the knickpoint migration commences. It was suggested that negative pressures developed by the reverse roller flow near the toe of the knickpoint face triggered undercutting of the knickpoint at this location. The pressure differential between the negative pressure and the atmospheric pressure also draws the impinging jet closer to the knickpoint face producing scour. In addition, the pressure differential may induce suction of sediment from the face. Other contributing factors include slump failure, seepage effects, and local fluvial erosion due to the exerted fluid shear. The prevailing flow conditions and soil information along with the channel cross-sectional geometry and gradient were used as inputs to a transcritical, one dimensional, hydraulic/geomorphic numerical model, which was used to map the flow characteristics and shear stress conditions near the knickpoint. Such detailed flow calculations do not exist in the published literature. The coupling of field and modeling work resulted in the development of a blueprint methodology, which can be adopted in different parts of the country for evaluating knickpoint evolution. This information will assist local government agencies in better understanding the principal factors that cause knickpoint propagation and help estimate the needed response time to control the propagation of a knickpoint after one has been identified.

[1]  R. H. Jordan,et al.  Physiographic History and the Soils, Entrenched Stream Systems, and Gullies, Harrison County, Iowa , 1965 .

[2]  O. Stein,et al.  Experiments and modeling of head cut migration in stratified soils , 2002 .

[3]  G. Pickup,et al.  Flume study of knickpoint development in stratified sediment , 1976 .

[4]  Norihiro Izumi,et al.  Purely erosional cyclic and solitary steps created by flow over a cohesive bed , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  R. V. Ruhe,et al.  GEOMORPHIC SURFACES AND THE NATURE OF SOILS , 1956 .

[6]  J. May,et al.  GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF ROCK EROSION IN EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CHANNELS. REPORT 4 - GEOLOGIC AND HYDRODYNAMIC CONTROLS ON THE MECHANICS OF KNICKPOINT MIGRATION. FINAL REPORT , 1989 .

[7]  Kerry M. Robinson,et al.  Gully Headcut Advance , 1996 .

[8]  S. Bennett,et al.  Predicting head cut erosion and migration in concentrated flows typical of upland areas , 2002 .

[9]  Gregory J. Hanson,et al.  HEADCUT MIGRATION ANALYSIS OF A COMPACTED SOIL , 1997 .

[10]  Andrew Simon,et al.  Pore‐water pressure effects on the detachment of cohesive streambeds: seepage forces and matric suction , 2001 .

[11]  Gregory J. Hanson,et al.  Influence of Backwater on Headcut Advance , 1996 .

[12]  Andrew Simon,et al.  Mechanisms and Rates of Knickpoint Migration in Cohesive Streambeds: Hydraulic Shear and Mass Failure. , 2001 .

[13]  Stanley A. Schumm,et al.  Knickpoint migration due to baselevel lowering , 1980 .

[14]  R. Daniels Entrenchment of the Willow Drainage Ditch, Harrison County, Iowa , 1960 .

[15]  A. Simon Energy, time, and channel evolution in catastrophically disturbed fluvial systems , 1992 .

[16]  Gregory J. Hanson,et al.  Stable Knickpoints Formed in Cohesive Sediment , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew Simon,et al.  Knickpoint Erosion and Migration in Cohesive Streambeds , 2000 .

[18]  Kerry M. Robinson Predicting Stress and Pressure at an Overfall , 1992 .

[19]  Javier Casalí,et al.  Effect of initial step height on headcut development in upland concentrated flows , 2001 .

[20]  T. W. Gardner,et al.  Experimental study of knickpoint and longitudinal profile evolution in cohesive, homogeneous material: Discussion and reply , 1983 .

[21]  Gregory J. Hanson,et al.  PREDICTION OF HEADCUT MIGRATION USING A DETERMINISTIC APPROACH , 2001 .

[22]  Andrew Simon,et al.  Processes and forms of an unstable alluvial system with resistant, cohesive streambeds , 2002 .

[23]  Nallamuthu Rajaratnam,et al.  Plane Turbulent Reattached Wall Jets , 1968 .

[24]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  One-dimensional hydrodynamic/sediment transport model applicable to steep mountain streams , 2004 .

[25]  Richard Frenette,et al.  Flow and Erosive Stresses at the Base of a Headcut , 2005 .

[26]  Gregory J. Hanson,et al.  VELOCITY FIELD MEASUREMENTS AT AN OVERFALL , 2000 .

[27]  Kerry M. Robinson Hydraulic Stresses on an Overfall Boundary , 1989 .

[28]  Sean J. Bennett,et al.  Turbulent flow and bed pressure within headcut scour holes due to plane reattached jets , 2006 .

[29]  G. J. Hanson,et al.  Large-scale headcut erosion testing , 1995 .

[30]  A. Simon,et al.  CHANNEL INSTABILITY IN THE LOESS AREA OF THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES 1 , 2000 .