Strategies for Creating, Generalising and Transferring Design Science Knowledge - A Methodological Discussion and Case Analysis

Design Science Research has been well accepted as part of Information Systems Research. The discussion about the research process and the structure of design theories has been going on for some time. While research has been done on the relation between design theories and other types of theories, not much has been said about how design knowledge can be re-used. Other disciplines refer to such re-use as “generalisation” and “transfer”. We define a three-level separation of design abstraction (short-, mid-, and long-range) and show how knowledge re-use strategies operate between and within them, as well as how they relate to generalisation and transfer. Each strategy is supported by a case from an existing publication, showing that the types of design theories and the research strategies can be found in practice. We argue that these research strategies can provide guidelines to researchers and reviewers for planning, performing and evaluation Design Science Research.

[1]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Epistemological perspectives on IS research: a framework for analysing and systematizing epistemological assumptions , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[3]  Julie Travis,et al.  Exploring the Constructs of Evaluative Criteria for Interpretivist Research , 1999 .

[4]  Robert Winter,et al.  Vorgehensmodell für das Management der unternehmensweiten Applikationsarchitektur , 2005, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[5]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Building theory in the sciences of the artificial , 2009, DESRIST.

[6]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology , 2007 .

[7]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[8]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[10]  Wolfgang Jonas,et al.  Case Transfer: A Design Approach by Artifacts and Projection , 2010, Design Issues.

[11]  John D. Aram,et al.  Bridging Scholarship in Management: Epistemological Reflections , 2003 .

[12]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Towards a paradigmatic shift in IS: designing for social practice , 2009, DESRIST.

[14]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[15]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  skillMap - A Social Software For Knowledge Management - From Concept To Proof , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[16]  Christine Legner,et al.  SOA Adoption in Practice - Findings from Early SOA Implementations , 2007, ECIS.

[17]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[18]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[19]  Venugopal Balijepally,et al.  Are Two Heads Better than One for Software Development? The Productivity Paradox of Pair Programming , 2009, MIS Q..

[20]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Udo Bub,et al.  A Method for Information Systems Development According to SOA , 2009, AMCIS.

[22]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[24]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Jens Dietrich Nutzung von Modellierungssprachen und -methodologien standardisierter B2B-Architekturen für die Integration unternehmensinterner Geschäftsprozesse: Evaluierung des Einsatzes der UN/CEFACT Modeling Methodology (UMM) bei einer deutschen Kapitalanlagegesellschaft , 2008 .

[26]  E. Guba Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries , 1981 .

[27]  Marten Schönherr,et al.  Artifact Types in Information Systems Design Science - A Literature Review , 2010, DESRIST.

[28]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[29]  Roland Gabriel,et al.  Integrated Information Securily Risk Management - Merging Business and Process Focused Approaches , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[30]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..