The correct dose: pharmacologically guided end point for anti-growth factor therapy.

Strategies to block the effects of tumor growth factors, such as estrogen, and to recruit other regulatory elements, such as with retinoids, have focused interest on the possibility of successful tumor intervention approaches. Approaches that neutralize the effects of critical molecules that drive tumor promotion are attractive targets for evaluation as new intervention agents. Clinical intervention trials with early stage patients or with subjects from "high risk" populations impose stricter types of constraints than conventional chemotherapy approaches in advanced stage patients. The potential for short-term toxicity has to be considered, as it may affect subject accrual or compliance. The longer expected survival of intervention subjects mandates closer attention to the possibilities of unexpected long-term toxicities with chronic administration of an intervention agent. As part of a Phase I clinical trial evaluating the utility of a monoclonal antibody directed against the autocrine growth factor, gastrin-releasing peptide to block the growth of small cell lung cancer, we developed a mathematical model to predict the requisite amount of antibody to neutralize growth factor effect. This model requires knowledge of the equilibrium concentration of the secreted growth factor, specific receptor, and bioavailability of the antibody in the tumor interstitium. A range of possible target doses of antibody can be developed to address the potential for heterogeneity frequently encountered in such systems, including a range of levels for peptide production and specific receptor expression. This approach could be applied to rationally derive treatment or intervention in which specific information regarding the relevant binding parameters is available. Through refinement of this modeling approach more context-specific dosing of agonist/antagonists could be determined which may decrease side effects associated with the drug administration.

[1]  T. Waldmann Methods for the study of the metabolism of immunoglobulins. , 1985, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  R. Love Prospects for antiestrogen chemoprevention of breast cancer. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  S. Larson,et al.  Phase I and imaging trial of indium 111-labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody 225 in patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  T. Moody,et al.  Bombesin-like peptides and receptors in human tumor cell lines , 1983, Peptides.

[5]  B. Chabner,et al.  Pharmacologically guided phase I clinical trials based upon preclinical drug development. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  C. Pert,et al.  High levels of intracellular bombesin characterize human small-cell lung carcinoma. , 1981, Science.

[7]  R. Reba,et al.  In vivo competition studies with analogues of 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate. , 1984, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  R. Reba,et al.  Calculation of binding isotherms when ligand and receptor are in different volumes of distribution. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  T. Moody,et al.  Bombesin-like peptides elevate cytosolic calcium in small cell lung cancer cells. , 1987, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[10]  A. Nusrat,et al.  Bombesin increases fetal lung growth and maturation in utero and in organ culture. , 1990, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[11]  John D. Minna,et al.  Bombesin-like peptides can function as autocrine growth factors in human small-cell lung cancer , 1985, Nature.

[12]  L J Peters,et al.  Prevention of second primary tumors with isotretinoin in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.