Influence of process conditions on the product properties in a continuous fluidized bed spray granulation process

Abstract This work focuses on continuously operated spray granulation processes in horizontal fluidized beds highlighting the influence of process conditions on the particle properties of the resulting product granules. The drying process has a decisive influence on the kinetics of the growth rate and thus also on the properties of the particles, such as the morphological structure, particle moisture content and porosity as well as density, compression strength and the wetting behavior. This influence has been considered in this study in more detail on the basis of the model material sodium benzoate. In order to compare the produced granules at different drying conditions and spray rates of the suspension an external product classification was used to achieve a certain product granule size. The obtained experimental results show a deep influence of the thermal conditions onto granule morphology and structural properties, which is in qualitative agreement with recent experimental observations (Rieck et al., 2015; Hoffmann et al., 2015a , Schmidt et al., 2017b ). The overall trend of the results reveal smoother product granules with decreasing spray rates of the suspension and increasing drying temperatures. These smoother surface morphologies lead to a more homogeneous layering which has as a consequence that the internal particle porosity is decreasing while the solids density and the compression strength of the particles are increasing at the same time. In this study the purely qualitative classification of the surface texture from previous experimental studies was extended by the topographic analysis of the product granules, giving the possibility to quantify the morphological structure by means of roughness measurements. This makes the morphological design accessible as product property and permits the utilization of models that describe the morphology according to the process conditions.

[1]  Anker Degn Jensen,et al.  Top-spray fluid bed coating: Scale-up in terms of relative droplet size and drying force , 2008 .

[2]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Experimental investigation and correlation of the Bodenstein number in horizontal fluidized beds with internal baffles , 2017 .

[3]  Costas Kiparissides,et al.  Evaluation of the morphological and release characteristics of coated fertilizer granules produced in a Wurster fluidized bed , 2003 .

[4]  V. Bucalá,et al.  The effect of binder concentration in fluidized-bed granulation: Transition between wet and melt granulation , 2017 .

[5]  H. D. Baehr,et al.  Thermodynamik : Grundlagen und technische Anwendungen , 1986 .

[6]  Stefan Heinrich,et al.  Energy absorption during compression and impact of dry elastic-plastic spherical granules , 2010 .

[7]  S. Heinrich,et al.  Breakage behaviour of spherical granulates by compression , 2005 .

[8]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  New vapour pressure measurements for argon and nitrogen and a new method for establishing rational vapour pressure equations , 1973 .

[9]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Influence of Granule Porosity during Fluidized Bed Spray Granulation , 2015 .

[10]  Stefan Heinrich,et al.  Influence of mill characteristics on stability of continuous layering granulation with external product classification , 2016 .

[11]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Shell porosity in spray fluidized bed coating with suspensions , 2017 .

[12]  Juliana Piña,et al.  Granule size distribution for a multi-chamber fluidized-bed melt granulator: Modeling and validation using process measurement data , 2013 .

[13]  Achim Kienle,et al.  A numerical bifurcation analysis of continuous fluidized bed spray granulation with external product classification , 2006 .

[14]  Andreas Bück,et al.  Experimental investigation of the influence of drying conditions on process stability of continuous spray fluidized bed layering granulation with external product separation , 2017 .

[15]  T. Lee,et al.  Contact Angle and Wetting Properties , 2013 .

[16]  Juliana Piña,et al.  Feedback control strategies for a continuous industrial fluidized-bed granulation process , 2015 .

[17]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Particle Formulation in Spray Fluidized Beds , 2011 .

[18]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Influence of Drying Kinetics on Particle Formation: A Personal Perspective , 2012 .

[19]  Henk J. Busscher,et al.  The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids , 1984 .

[20]  Andreas Bück,et al.  Experimental investigation of process stability of continuous spray fluidized bed layering with internal separation , 2015 .

[21]  H. Kalman,et al.  Determination of elastic properties of particles using single particle compression test , 2014 .

[22]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Surfaces and their Measurement , 2002 .

[23]  Stefan Heinrich,et al.  Collision dynamics in fluidised bed granulators: A DEM-CFD study , 2013 .

[24]  Stefan Palis,et al.  Auto-tuning control systems for improved operation of continuous fluidized bed spray granulation processes with external product classification , 2015 .

[25]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Determination of particle exchange rates at over-flow weirs in horizontal fluidised beds by particle tracking velocimetry , 2017 .

[26]  Stefan Palis,et al.  Model-based control of particle properties in fluidised bed spray granulation , 2015 .

[27]  CFD-PBE SIMULATION FOR AN INDUSTRIAL GRANULATION PROCESS WITH SCREENING-CRUSHING , 2012 .

[28]  Chris Vervaet,et al.  Continuous melt granulation: Influence of process and formulation parameters upon granule and tablet properties. , 2016, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[29]  S. Heinrich,et al.  Analysis of the start-up process in continuous fluidized bed spray granulation by population balance modelling , 2002 .

[30]  J. McGarry Correlation and prediction of the vapor pressures of pure liquids over large pressure ranges , 1983 .

[31]  Stefan Palis,et al.  Influence of operation parameters on process stability in continuous fluidised bed layering with external product classification , 2016 .

[32]  Andreas Bück,et al.  Influence of drying conditions on layer porosity in fluidized bed spray granulation , 2015 .

[33]  Andreas Bück,et al.  Investigation of coating layer morphology by micro-computed X-ray tomography , 2015 .

[34]  Andreas Bück,et al.  Prediction of Shell Porosities in Continuous Fluidized Bed Spray Layering , 2015 .

[35]  Stefan Heinrich,et al.  A dynamic two-zone model of continuous fluidized bed layering granulation with internal product classification , 2017 .

[36]  Stefan Heinrich,et al.  DEM–CFD modeling of a fluidized bed spray granulator , 2011 .

[37]  A. Kienle,et al.  Discrepancy based control of particulate processes , 2014 .

[38]  Juliana Piña,et al.  Fluidized-bed melt granulation: The effect of operating variables on process performance and granule properties , 2015 .

[39]  S. Palzer,et al.  Einfluss der Rauhigkeit einer Feststoffoberfläche auf den Kontaktwinkel , 2001 .

[40]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Characterization of the internal morphology of agglomerates produced in a spray fluidized bed by X-ray tomography , 2012 .

[41]  C. Arlt,et al.  Particle exchange in horizontal two-compartment fluidized beds – CFD simulation and experimental validation , 2017 .

[42]  R. Good,et al.  Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: a critical review , 1992 .

[43]  M. Kind,et al.  CFD-PBE simulation to predict particle growth in a fluidized bed melt granulation batch process , 2016 .