Learning outcome, presence and satisfaction from a science activity in Second Life

Although problem-based learning (PBL) has many advantages, it often fails to connect to the real world outside the classroom. The integration with the laboratory setting and the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) have been proposed to address this deficiency. Multi-user virtual environments (MUVEs) like Second Life (SL) are 3D collaborative virtual environments that could act as complementary or alternative worlds for the implementation of laboratory PBL activities offering low-cost, safe, and always available environments. The aim of this study was to compare a simple laboratory PBL activity implemented in both the real and virtual worlds, in terms of learning outcome, satisfaction, and presence. The sample consisted of 150 undergraduate university students. The results show that the MUVE provided similar learning outcome and satisfaction to the real-world condition. Presence was positively correlated to satisfaction but not to the learning outcome. Finally, there are indications that the MUVE was perceived as more pleasurable and informal learning environment, while reality was perceived as more stressful.

[1]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Design-based research strategies for studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment , 2004 .

[2]  Ciara R. Wigham,et al.  A study of verbal and nonverbal communication in Second Life – the ARCHI21 experience , 2013, ReCALL.

[3]  Sara de Freitas,et al.  Editorial: Crossing boundaries: Learning and teaching in virtual worlds , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Jorge Pomares,et al.  Experiences with Virtual Environment and Remote Laboratory for Teaching and Learning Robotics at the University of Alicante , 2006 .

[5]  Nikiforos M. Papachristos,et al.  Presence in a Collaborative Science Learning Activity in Second Life , 2012 .

[6]  Robert Howard,et al.  Teaching physics to engineering students using problem-based learning , 2003 .

[7]  Stephanie Henderson-Begg,et al.  The Learning Gains and Student Perceptions of a Second Life Virtual Lab , 2009 .

[8]  Jacquelyn Ford Morie,et al.  Virtual Chironomia: Developing Standards for Non-verbal Communication in Virtual Worlds , 2009 .

[9]  M. Eraut.  Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  S. Barab,et al.  Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play , 2007 .

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Christophe Gravier,et al.  Collaborative remote laboratory in virtual world , 2010 .

[13]  G. Salmon,et al.  Editorial: Out of this world , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[15]  Vojko Valencic,et al.  Discovering electricity by computer-based experiments , 2003, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[16]  D. Shanks.  IMPLICIT LEARNING AND TACIT KNOWLEDGE - AN ESSAY ON THE COGNITIVE UNCONSCIOUS - REBER,A , 1995 .

[17]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[18]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[19]  D. Jonassen.  Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model , 1994 .

[20]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[21]  Saniye Tugba Bulu,et al.  Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to cell biology teaching: learning content in context--problem-based learning. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[23]  Claudia L. Garzón-Castro,et al.  Second Life as a support element for learning electronic related subjects: A real case , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  C. Rae,et al.  Problem-Based Labs and Group Projects in an Introductory University Physics Course. , 2012 .

[26]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Designing Assessments and Assessing Designs in Virtual Educational Environments , 2009 .

[27]  Sarah Smith-Robbins,et al.  This is Not a Game - Social Virtual Worlds, Fun, and Learning , 2010, Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds.

[28]  Nikiforos M. Papachristos,et al.  Designing a Collaborative Learning Activity in Second Life - An Exploratory Study in Physics , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[29]  Michael K. Seery,et al.  Developing practical chemistry skills by means of student-driven problem based learning mini-projects , 2007 .

[30]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  MEASURING PRESENCE: A LITERATURE-BASED APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDARDIZED PAPER-AND-PENCIL INSTRUMENT , 2000 .

[31]  S. Cobb,et al.  Social Presence and Online Learning: A Current View from a Research Perspective. , 2009 .

[32]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Learning Theories and Problem-Based Learning , 2012 .

[33]  A. Kolmos,et al.  Problem Based Learning , 2007 .

[34]  D. Allen,et al.  What is Problem-Based Learning? , 2006 .

[35]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[36]  Feihong Wang,et al.  Second Life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 2011 , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[38]  Daniel S. Domin,et al.  A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles , 1999 .

[39]  H S Barrows,et al.  A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods , 1986, Medical education.

[40]  M. Lombard,et al.  Measuring Presence: The Temple Presence Inventory , 2009 .

[41]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for Distance Education chemistry students , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Small-Group Behavior in a Virtual and Real Environment: A Comparative Study , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[43]  Rita Francese,et al.  Wiimote and Kinect: gestural user interfaces add a natural third dimension to HCI , 2012, AVI.

[44]  Jim X. Chen,et al.  A Model for Understanding How Virtual Reality Aids Complex Conceptual Learning , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[45]  Hans van Buuren,et al.  Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[46]  Nikiforos M. Papachristos,et al.  The role of environment design in an educational Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[47]  Lance Chun Che Fung,et al.  does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural , 2012 .

[48]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[49]  Odilla Finlayson,et al.  Providing solutions through problem-based learning for the undergraduate 1st year chemistry laboratory , 2007 .

[50]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Investigating user experience in Second Life for collaborative learning , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  Albert J. Rosa,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[52]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[53]  Shelagh A. Gallagher,et al.  Implementing Problem‐Based Learning in Science Classrooms , 1995 .

[54]  K. McCusker,et al.  Engineering Education Island: Teaching Engineering in Virtual Worlds , 2009 .

[55]  José Sánchez Moreno,et al.  A Network of Automatic Control Web-Based Laboratories , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[56]  C. McGrath,et al.  Problem-based learning in clinical education: the next generation , 2012 .

[57]  Michele D. Dickey.  Brave new (interactive) worlds: A review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments , 2005, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[58]  Chwen Jen Chen,et al.  The design, development and evaluation of a virtual reality based learning environment , 2006 .

[59]  Thomas A. Furness,et al.  Spatial perception in virtual environments: Evaluating an architectural application , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[60]  Carol Hostetter,et al.  Measuring up Online: The Relationship between Social Presence and Student Learning Satisfaction. , 2006 .

[61]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[62]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  The future for (second) life and learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..