Incorporating Uncertainty Into the Ranking of SPARROW Model Nutrient Yields From Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin Watersheds1

Excessive loads of nutrients transported by tributary rivers have been linked to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Management efforts to reduce the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico and improve the water quality of rivers and streams could benefit from targeting nutrient reductions toward watersheds with the highest nutrient yields delivered to sensitive downstream waters. One challenge is that most conventional watershed modeling approaches (e.g., mechanistic models) used in these management decisions do not consider uncertainties in the predictions of nutrient yields and their downstream delivery. The increasing use of parameter estimation procedures to statistically estimate model coefficients, however, allows uncertainties in these predictions to be reliably estimated. Here, we use a robust bootstrapping procedure applied to the results of a previous application of the hybrid statistical/mechanistic watershed model SPARROW (Spatially Referenced Regression On Watershed attributes) to develop a statistically reliable method for identifying “high priority” areas for management, based on a probabilistic ranking of delivered nutrient yields from watersheds throughout a basin. The method is designed to be used by managers to prioritize watersheds where additional stream monitoring and evaluations of nutrient-reduction strategies could be undertaken. Our ranking procedure incorporates information on the confidence intervals of model predictions and the corresponding watershed rankings of the delivered nutrient yields. From this quantified uncertainty, we estimate the probability that individual watersheds are among a collection of watersheds that have the highest delivered nutrient yields. We illustrate the application of the procedure to 818 eight-digit Hydrologic Unit Code watersheds in the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River basin by identifying 150 watersheds having the highest delivered nutrient yields to the Gulf of Mexico. Highest delivered yields were from watersheds in the Central Mississippi, Ohio, and Lower Mississippi River basins. With 90% confidence, only a few watersheds can be reliably placed into the highest 150 category; however, many more watersheds can be removed from consideration as not belonging to the highest 150 category. Results from this ranking procedure provide robust information on watershed nutrient yields that can benefit management efforts to reduce nutrient loadings to downstream coastal waters, such as the Gulf of Mexico, or to local receiving streams and reservoirs.

[1]  S. Corsi,et al.  Unit-area loads of suspended sediment, suspended solids and total phosphorus from small watersheds in Wisconsin , 1997 .

[2]  Richard A. Smith,et al.  Section 3. The SPARROW Surface Water-Quality Model: Theory, Application and User Documentation , 2006 .

[3]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  ERF1_2 -- Enhanced River Reach File 2.0 , 2003 .

[4]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  The National Stream Quality Accounting Network: a flux‐based approach to monitoring the water quality of large rivers , 2001 .

[5]  Seungbong Han,et al.  Landscape Planning for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction III: Assessing Phosphorus and Sediment Reduction Potential , 2009, Environmental management.

[6]  J. Selegean,et al.  Assessing Sediment Loading from Agricultural Croplands in the Great Lakes Basin , 2005 .

[7]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Flux and Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin , 1999 .

[8]  M. Chavance [Jackknife and bootstrap]. , 1992, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[9]  Gregory E Schwarz,et al.  Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  M. Jha,et al.  INITIAL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL FOR THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN , 2003 .

[11]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system , 2002 .

[12]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data , 1997 .

[13]  J. Doherty,et al.  Role of the calibration process in reducing model predictive error , 2005 .

[14]  Robert Perciasepe,et al.  National Strategy For The Development Of Regional Nutrient Criteria , 1998 .

[15]  Thomas M. Isenhart,et al.  Optimizing the placement of riparian practices in a watershed using terrain analysis , 2003 .