Determining the number of casualties and fatalities suffered in militarized conflicts is important for conflict measurement, forecasting, and accountability. However, given the nature of conflict, reliable statistics on casualties are rare. Countries or political actors involved in conflicts have incentives to hide or manipulate these numbers, while third parties might not have access to reliable information. For example, in the ongoing militarized conflict between Russia and Ukraine, estimates of the magnitude of losses vary wildly, sometimes across orders of magnitude. In this paper, we offer an approach for measuring casualties and fatalities given multiple reporting sources and, at the same time, accounting for the biases of those sources. We construct a dataset of 4,609 reports of military and civilian losses by both sides. We then develop a statistical model to better estimate losses for both sides given these reports. Our model accounts for different kinds of reporting biases, structural correlations between loss types, and integrates loss reports at different temporal scales. Our daily and cumulative estimates provide evidence that Russia has lost more personnel than has Ukraine and also likely suffers from a higher fatality to casualty ratio. We find that both sides likely overestimate the personnel losses suffered by their opponent and that Russian sources underestimate their own losses of personnel.
[1]
Michael B. Gibilisco,et al.
Strategic Reporting: A Formal Model of Biases in Conflict Data
,
2022,
American Political Science Review.
[2]
Michael Colaresi,et al.
Lessons from an escalation prediction competition
,
2022,
International Interactions.
[3]
F. Burkle,et al.
Review of Military Casualties in Modern Conflicts—The Re-emergence of Casualties From Armored Warfare
,
2021,
Military medicine.
[4]
C. Murray,et al.
Fifty years of violent war deaths from Vietnam to Bosnia: analysis of data from the world health survey programme
,
2008,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[5]
Jason Reifler,et al.
Casualties, Polls, and the Iraq War
,
2006,
International Security.
[6]
Bethany Lacina.
Explaining the Severity of Civil Wars
,
2006
.
[7]
N. P. Gleditsch,et al.
Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths
,
2005
.
[8]
Richard Ruggles,et al.
An Empirical Approach to Economic Intelligence in World War II
,
1947
.
[9]
Michael Spagat,et al.
An Arena of Contestation
,
2009
.