The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian

Abstract It is commonly believed that the same neural mechanism underlies the tilt illusion and the tilt aftereffect. Recently, it has been demonstrated that tilt aftereffects induced on oblique stimuli are similar, in magnitude and direction, to those induced on stimuli which are vertical or horizontal. If the mechanisms of the illusion and aftereffect are the same, then illusions induced on oblique stimuli should also be similar to those induced on vertical or horizontal stimuli. The six experiments reported here confirmed this prediction by suggesting that both repulsion (direct) and attraction (indirect) tilt illusions occur in the oblique meridian. The data are considered in relation to both psychophysical (normalisation) and neural (lateral inhibition) theories of orientation illusions and aftereffects.

[1]  T. Oyama,et al.  Determinants of the Zöllner illusion , 1975, Psychological research.

[2]  F. Campbell,et al.  The tilt after-effect: a fresh look. , 1971, Vision research.

[3]  A note on visual illusions of direction , 1964 .

[4]  J. R. Harris,et al.  TWO DIFFERENT AFTER-EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO VISUAL TILTS. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  G. K. Wallace.  The effect of contrast on the Zöllner illusion , 1975, Vision Research.

[6]  R Over,et al.  Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  Visual discrimination and orientation. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Orientation illusions and after-effects: Inhibition between channels , 1975, Vision Research.

[9]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian? , 1976, Vision Research.

[10]  D. J. Crampin,et al.  The effect of background density on the Zöllner illusion. , 1969, Vision research.

[11]  H. Bouma,et al.  Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments. , 1970, Vision research.

[12]  M A Georgeson,et al.  Psychophysical Hallucinations of Orientation and Spatial Frequency , 1976, Perception.

[13]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  INHIBITORY INTERACTION OF RECEPTOR UNITS IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS , 1957, The Journal of general physiology.

[14]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[15]  C Ware,et al.  Interocular transfer of a visual after‐effect in normal and stereoblind humans , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  R Over,et al.  Orientation illusion and masking in central and peripheral vision. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  E. Matin,et al.  Light adaptation and the dynamics of induced tilt. , 1974, Vision research.

[19]  Measuring perceived orientation , 1975, Vision Research.

[20]  P. Wenderoth.  The Distinction between the Rod-and-Frame Illusion and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1974, Perception.

[21]  A M ROCHLIN,et al.  The effect of tilt on the visual perception of parallelness. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  J. Gibson.  Adaptation with negative after-effect. , 1937 .

[23]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral Inhibition between Orientation Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1970, Nature.