Activity and the formation of ocular dominance patches in dually innervated tectum of goldfish

This study tested (1) whether blocking impulse activity in both eyes of fish with one tectum prevents the formation of ocular dominance patches, (2) whether areas receiving a high density of innervation from one eye receive a low density from the other, and (3) whether there is an electrophysiological correlate to the anatomical patches. One tectum was removed in goldfish so that the optic nerve fibers from both eyes would compete for synaptic space in the remaining tectum. The terminal arbors from the two projections initially overlapped but by 50 to 60 days segregated into ocular dominance patches, demonstrated by labeling both projections, the normal one with horseradish peroxidase and the regenerating one with tritiated proline radioautography. Alternate sections were processed for radioautography and histochemistry. All projections were drawn by “blind” observers using a camera lucida and were fully reconstructed. Both the level of patchiness within each projection and the correspondence of patches and holes between the two projections were quantified from these reconstructions. Binocular tetrodotoxin (TTX) injections from 18 to 75 days after surgery significantly reduced patchiness, as compared to controls injected with citrate-Ringers solution. When the binocular block was continued until 95 days, segregation was still significantly reduced relative to controls. These results support a hypothesis for an activity-dependent mechanism of segregation of ocular dominance patches. In controls but not TTX-blocked fish, there was a significant tendency for high density areas in one projection to receive a lower density projection from the other eye, and vice versa. However, the two projections were not entirely complementary. Survival of control fish for an additional 5 months resulted in more sharply defined patches but no increase in complementarity. Recordings of field potentials evoked by shocking either optic nerve demonstrated an electrophysiological correlate to the anatomical patches in single tectal fish. Large field potentials from one eye were generally associated with small potentials from the other eye, and vice versa. When the recording sites were marked with electrolytic lesions, there was a direct and significant correlation between the magnitude of the field potentials and the density of the anatomical ocular dominance patches.

[1]  R L Meyer,et al.  Eye dominance columns from an isogenic double-nasal frog eye. , 1983, Science.

[2]  D. Edwards,et al.  Intraocular tetrodotoxin in goldfish hinders optic nerve regeneration , 1983, Brain Research.

[3]  J. Schmidt,et al.  The re-establishment of synaptic transmission by regenerating optic axons in goldfish: Time course and effects of blocking activity by intraocular injection of tetrodotoxin , 1983, Brain Research.

[4]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Activity sharpens the map during the regeneration of the retinotectal projection in goldfish , 1983, Brain Research.

[5]  R L Meyer,et al.  Tetrodotoxin blocks the formation of ocular dominance columns in goldfish. , 1982, Science.

[6]  M. Murray,et al.  Target regulation of synaptic number in the compressed retinotectal projection of goldfish , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  D. Willshaw,et al.  Compound eyes project stripes on the optic tectum in Xenopus , 1982, Nature.

[8]  A. Springer,et al.  Optic fiber segregation in goldfish with two eyes innervating one tectal lobe , 1981, Brain Research.

[9]  M. Law,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of experimentally produced striped tecta , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  N. V. Swindale,et al.  Absence of ocular dominance patches in dark-reared cats , 1981, Nature.

[11]  R. L. Levine,et al.  Time course and pattern of optic fiber regeneration following tectal lobe removal in the goldfish , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  John T. Schmidt,et al.  Electrophysiologic evidence that retinotectal synaptic transmission in the goldfish is nicotinic cholinergic , 1980, Brain Research.

[14]  M. Law,et al.  Right and left eye bands in frogs with unilateral tectal ablations. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Schmidt.  The Laminar organization of optic nerve fibres in the tectum of goldfish , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  H. Wolburg.  Growth and Myelination of Goldfish Optic Nerve Fibers after Retina Regeneration and Nerve Crush , 1978, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[17]  M. Law,et al.  Eye-specific termination bands in tecta of three-eyed frogs. , 1978, Science.

[18]  M. Stryker,et al.  Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  J. Schmidt,et al.  The paths and destinations of the induced ipsilateral retinal projection in goldfish. , 1978, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[20]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: A quantitative study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Tetramethyl benzidine for horseradish peroxidase neurohistochemistry: a non-carcinogenic blue reaction product with superior sensitivity for visualizing neural afferents and efferents. , 1978, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[22]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Retinal fibers alter tectal positional markers during the expansion of the half retinal projection in goldfish , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Reversed visuomotor behavior mediated by induced ipsilateral retinal projections in goldfish. , 1977, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Hubel,et al.  Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  J. Changeux,et al.  Selective stabilisation of developing synapses as a mechanism for the specification of neuronal networks , 1976, Nature.

[26]  C. Malsburg,et al.  How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  P. Rakic.  Prenatal genesis of connections subserving ocular dominance in the rhesus monkey , 1976, Nature.

[28]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Discontinuous mapping of retina onto tectum innervated by both eyes , 1975, Brain Research.

[29]  P. Luiten.  The horseradish peroxidase technique applied to the teleostean nervous system , 1975, Brain Research.

[30]  D H Hubel,et al.  Autoradiographic demonstration of ocular-dominance columns in the monkey striate cortex by means of transneuronal transport. , 1974, Brain research.

[31]  S. Sharma.  Anomalous retinal projection after removal of contralateral optic tectum in adult goldfish. , 1973, Experimental neurology.

[32]  H. Vanegas,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of tectal efferents to the fish eye. , 1973, Brain research.

[33]  P. Witkovsky.  Synapses made by myelinated fibers running to teleost and elasmobranch retinas , 1971, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomical Demonstration of Columns in the Monkey Striate Cortex , 1969, Nature.

[35]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1963 .