Adaptive certainty-based classification for decomposition of EMG signals

An adaptive certainty-based supervised classification approach for electromyographic (EMG) signal decomposition is presented and evaluated. Similarity criterion used for grouping motor unit potentials (MUPs) is based on a combination of MUP shapes and two modes of use of motor unit (MU) firing pattern information: passive and active. Performance of the developed classifier was evaluated using synthetic signals of known properties and real signals and compared with the performance of the certainty classifier (CC). Across the sets of simulated and real EMG signals used for comparison, the adaptive certainty classifier (ACC) had both better average performance and lower performance variability. For simulated signals of varying intensity, the ACC had an average correct classification rate (CCr) of 83.7% with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 5.8% compared to 78.3 and 8.7%, respectively, for the CC. For simulated signals with varying amounts of shape and/or firing pattern variability, the ACC had a CCr of 79.7% with a MAD of 4.7% compared to 76.6 and 6.9%, respectively, for the CC. For real signals, the ACC had a CCr of 70.0% with a MAD of 6.3% compared to 64.9 and 6.4%, respectively, for the CC. The test results demonstrate that the ACC can manage both MUP shape variability as well as MU firing pattern variability. The ACC adapts to EMG signal characteristics to create dynamic data driven classification criteria so that the number of MUP assignments made reflects the signal complexity and the number of erroneous assignments is kept sufficiently low. The ability of the ACC to adjust to specific signal characteristics suggests that it can be successfully applied to a wide variety of EMG signals.

[1]  Metin Akay Applications of Fuzzy Clustering to Biomedical Signal Processing and Dynamic System Identification , 2000 .

[2]  E. Kaplan Muscles Alive. Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. J. V. Basmajian. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Co., 1962. $8.50 , 1962 .

[3]  J. Basmajian Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .

[4]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  H. Devries MUSCLES ALIVE-THEIR FUNCTIONS REVEALED BY ELECTROMYOGRAPHY , 1976 .

[6]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust method for estimating motor unit firing-pattern statistics , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[7]  P. Lago,et al.  Effect of motor-unit firing time statistics on e.m.g. spectra , 1977, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[9]  P. Matthews Relationship of firing intervals of human motor units to the trajectory of post‐spike after‐hyperpolarization and synaptic noise. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  Physiology and Mathematics of Myoelectric Signals , 1979 .

[11]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Decomposition‐based quantitative electromyography: Methods and initial normative data in five muscles , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Shiro Usui,et al.  Digital Low-Pass Differentiation for Biological Signal Processing , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Dr. D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[15]  D Stashuk,et al.  EMG signal decomposition: how can it be accomplished and used? , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  Daniel W. Stashuk,et al.  Physiologically based simulation of clinical EMG signals , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.