PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY : A STUDY OF 100 CONSECUTIVE CASES OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

Tracheal intubation and controlled ventilation is the gold standard for the anaesthetic management of a patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), a modified version of the Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA), is being considered as an alternative airway device for a wide range of laparoscopic surgical procedures. The aim of the study was to assess the use of the PLMA as a ventilatory device in anaesthetised paralysed patients for various elective laparoscopic procedures. This prospective study comprised 100 patients between the age of 18-85 years, of either sex, belonging to physical status ASA IIII. We assessed haemodynamic responses to insertion of the PLMA, ventilatory parameters, ease of gastric tube placement, gastric insufflation and any postoperative complications. The statistically analysed results showed that the PLMA caused minimum haemodynamic responses to insertion, was a reliable airway management device ensuring adequate ventilation and providing an effective glottic seal in all but one patient. It allowed easy passage of gastric tube. There were three cases of oesophageal regurgitation but no incidence of pulmonary aspiration. Sore throat was reported in three patients.

[1]  S. V. Gardner,et al.  The proseal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  J. Nolan,et al.  Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  M. Stix,et al.  Esophageal insufflation with normal fiberoptic positioning of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  C. Keller,et al.  A Multicenter Study Comparing the ProSealTM and ClassicTM Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized, Nonparalyzed Patients , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[5]  J. Brimacombe,et al.  The ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomized, Crossover Study with the Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[6]  G. Fick,et al.  Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-classic vs. tracheal intubation , 2000, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[7]  C. Verghese,et al.  The LMA 'ProSeal'--a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  C. Keller,et al.  Laryngeal Mask Airway Size Selection in Males and Females: Ease of Insertion, Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure, Pharyngeal Mucosal Pressures and Anatomical Position , 2000 .

[9]  C. Keller,et al.  Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  E. Frost The Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Review and Practical Guide. , 1998 .

[11]  J. Sackier,et al.  Continuous esophageal pH monitoring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1994, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  Y. Koga [Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery]. , 1994, Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology.

[13]  J. Viale,et al.  Pulmonary CO2 Elimination During Surgical Procedures Using Intra‐ or Extraperitoneal CO2 Insufflation , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  T. Howells The administration of metoclopramide with atropine , 1977, Anaesthesia.

[15]  G. Fick,et al.  LMA-Classic™ and LMA-ProSeal™ are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[16]  A. Buniatian,et al.  [Laryngeal mask under total myoplegia and artificial pulmonary ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomies]. , 1997, Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk.

[17]  N. Hindocha,et al.  Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on the lower esophageal sphincter. , 1989, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  J. F. Lind,et al.  Responses of the gastroesophageal junctional zone to increases in abdominal pressure. , 1966, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.