论文信息 - A comparison of ontology reasoning systems using query sequences

A comparison of ontology reasoning systems using query sequences

A number of ontology reasoning systems have been developed for reasoning and querying the semantic web. Since they implement different reasoning algorithms and optimization techniques, they differ in a number of ways. Previous attempts at comparing performance of ontology reasoning systems have mainly considered performances of individual query requests. In this paper, we present the results of testing four of the most popular ontology reasoning systems on query sequences that reflect real world use cases. We believe that using query sequences is a more effective way to evaluate ontology reasoning systems.

[1] Li Ma,et al. Towards a Complete OWL Ontology Benchmark , 2006, ESWC.

[2] Ian Horrocks,et al. Automated Benchmarking of Description Logic Reasoners , 2006, Description Logics.

[3] Thorsten Liebig,et al. Real-World Reasoning with OWL , 2007, ESWC.

[4] Jeff Heflin,et al. Rapid Benchmarking for Semantic Web Knowledge Base Systems , 2005, SEMWEB.

[5] Changtao Qu,et al. Semantics-Enabled Service Discovery Framework in the SIMDAT Pharma Grid , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[6] Jeff Heflin,et al. LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems , 2005, J. Web Semant..

[7] Boris Motik,et al. A Comparison of Reasoning Techniques for Querying Large Description Logic ABoxes , 2006, LPAR.