Effective Sensor Placements for the Estimation of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Mode Coefficients in von Karman Vortex Street

For feedback control using low-dimensional proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) models, the mode amplitudes of the POD mode coefficients need to be estimated based on sensor readings. This paper is aimed at suppressing the von Kairman vortex street in the wake of a circular cylinder using a low-dimensional approach based on POD. We compare sensor placement methods based on the spatial distribution of the POD modes to arbitrary ad hoc methods. Flow field data were obtained from Navier-Stokes simulation as well as particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements. A low-dimensional POD was applied to the snapshot ensembles from the experiment and simulation. Linear stochastic estimation was used to map the sensor readings of the velocity field on the POD mode coefficients. We studied 53 sensor placement configurations, 32 of which were based on POD eigenfunctions and the others using ad hoc methods. The effectiveness of the sensor configurations was investigated at Re = 100 for the computational fluid dynamic data, and for a Reynolds number range of 82-99 for the water tunnel PIV data. Results show that a five-sensor configuration can keep the root mean square estimation error, for the amplitudes of the first two modes to within 4% for simulation data and within 10% for the PIV data. This level of error is acceptable for a moderately robust controller The POD-based design was found to be simpler. more effective, and robust compared to the ad hoc methods examined.

[1]  Haim Baruh,et al.  Sensor Placement in Structural Control , 1990 .

[2]  H Oertel,et al.  Wakes behind blunt bodies , 1990 .

[3]  I. Kevrekidis,et al.  Low‐dimensional models for complex geometry flows: Application to grooved channels and circular cylinders , 1991 .

[4]  James H. Myatt,et al.  Real-Time Particle Image Velocimetry for Closed-Loop Flow Control Studies , 2003 .

[5]  E. W. Hendricks,et al.  Feedback control of a global mode in spatially developing flows , 1993 .

[6]  M. Balas Active control of flexible systems , 1978 .

[7]  Mark N. Glauser,et al.  Stochastic estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition: Complementary techniques for identifying structure , 1994 .

[8]  C. Williamson Vortex Dynamics in the Cylinder Wake , 1996 .

[9]  K B Lim A Disturbance Rejection Approach to Actuator and Sensor Placement , 1997 .

[10]  R. Temam,et al.  On some control problems in fluid mechanics , 1990 .

[11]  Kimon Roussopoulos,et al.  Feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Modeling of a Controlled Ginzburg-Landau Cylinder Wake Model , 2003 .

[13]  Haecheon Choi,et al.  Suboptimal feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Ionel M. Navon,et al.  Optimal control of cylinder wakes via suction and blowing , 2003, Computers & Fluids.

[15]  Stefan Siegel,et al.  Modeling of the Wake Behind a Circular Cylinder Undergoing Rotational Oscillation , 2002 .

[16]  Mae L. Seto,et al.  On drag, Strouhal number and vortex-street structure , 2002 .

[17]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[18]  E. A. Gillies,et al.  Feedback Control of a Cylinder Wake Low-Dimensional Model , 2003 .

[19]  H. Carlson,et al.  Reduced-order modeling and sensing of flow separation on lifting surfaces , 2002 .

[20]  E. A. Gillies Low-dimensional control of the circular cylinder wake , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.