Comparison of Diagnostic Ability of Conventional Film and Storage Phosphor Plate in Detecting Proximal Caries with Direct Measurements by Stereomicroscope: A Diagnostic Test Evaluation

Background: Radiography plays an important role in detection of interproximal caries. The aim of study is to compare diagnostic ability of conventional film and photostimulable phosphor (PSP) with direct measurement using stereomicroscope in detecting proximal caries. Methodology: In this descriptive study – diagnostic test evaluation, 200 proximal surfaces of 100 extracted human posterior teeth were radiographed with dental X-ray unit. Evaluation of conventional and digital radiographs was performed twice by three observers. Carious lesions were classified based on a four-point scale (R0–R3) suggested by Abesi et al. Weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess intra- and interobserver agreement for each image set. Indices of diagnostic ability calculation were based on the first readings of the three observers. The scores were compared with the histological gold standard using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate diagnostic ability. Results: Intraobserver kappa coefficients calculated for each observer for each method of detecting caries ranged from 0.914 to 0.956. Interobserver kappa coefficients for each image set ranged from 0.8788 to 0.9583. The sensitivity and specificity of film for the first observer were 77.5% and 78.3% and for PSP were 77.5% and 80%, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant results (P > 0.05) between Az values for the two detection methods. Conclusion: PSP plate should be preferred over conventional films in detecting cavitated proximal caries. Further studies with more noncavitated proximal surfaces are required to conclusively establish the diagnostic ability of PSP over conventional film.

[1]  M. Rahbar,et al.  Comparison of the Accuracy of Digital Radiography with Conventional Radiography and Visual Examination in the Detection of Permanent Teeth Interproximal Caries , 2019, Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada.

[2]  M. Dehghani,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Conventional and Digital Radiography for Detection of Cavitated and Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries , 2017, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  B. Czarnecka,et al.  A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[4]  A. Bagchi,et al.  Prevalence of dental caries and treatment needs in children in coastal areas of West Bengal , 2013, Contemporary clinical dentistry.

[5]  Roxana Oancea,et al.  Stereomicroscopic study of the human tooth caries: clinical and morphological correlations , 2012, Photonics Europe.

[6]  Ali Bijani,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Radiography in the Detection of Non-Cavitated Approximal Dental Caries , 2012, Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society.

[7]  P. Campos,et al.  Assessment of enamel-dentin caries lesions detection using bitewing PSP digital images , 2011, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[8]  K. Kamburoğlu,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  D. D. de Melo,et al.  Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  B. Altunkaynak,et al.  In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[11]  A. Glaros,et al.  In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries. , 2007, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  Sofia Tranæus,et al.  In vivo detection of non-cavitated caries lesions on occlusal surfaces by visual inspection and quantitative light-induced fluorescence , 2007, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[13]  G. Stookey,et al.  Emerging methods of caries diagnosis. , 2001, Journal of dental education.

[14]  R. Ellwood,et al.  An in vitro Comparison of the Ability of Fibre–Optic Transillumination, Visual Inspection and Radiographs to Detect Occlusal Caries and Evaluate Lesion Depth , 2000, Caries Research.

[15]  J R Geist,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[16]  W Huda,et al.  Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[17]  Zu-yan Zhang,et al.  The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[18]  C. Price,et al.  A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model. , 1997, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Stereomicroscopy, film radiography, microradiography and naked-eye inspection of tooth sections as validation for occlusal caries diagnosis. , 1995, Caries research.