Uncertainty, politics, and technology: Expert perceptions on energy transitions in the United Kingdom

Abstract Energy policy is beset by deep uncertainties, owing to the scale of future transitions, the long-term timescales for action, and numerous stakeholders. This paper provides insights from semi-structured interviews with 31 UK experts from government, industry, academia, and civil society. Participants were asked for their views on the major uncertainties surrounding the ability of the UK to meet its 2050 climate targets. The research reveals a range of views on the most critical uncertainties, how they can be mitigated, and how the research community can develop approaches to better support strategic decision-making. The study finds that the socio-political dimensions of uncertainty are discussed by experts almost as frequently as technological ones, but that there exist divergent perspectives on the role of government in the transition and whether or not there is a requirement for increased societal engagement. Finally, the study finds that decision-makers require a new approach to uncertainty assessment that overcomes analytical limits to existing practice, is more flexible and adaptable, and which better integrates qualitative narratives with quantitative analysis. Policy design must escape from ‘caged’ thinking concerning what can or cannot be included in models, and therefore what types of uncertainties can or cannot be explored.

[1]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  UKERC Energy Systems Theme Reflecting on Scenarios , 2014 .

[2]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Our Knowledge of the World is Often Not Simple: Policymakers Should Not Duck that Fact, But Should Deal with It , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  R. Gross,et al.  The impact of uncertainties on the UK's medium-term climate change targets , 2015 .

[5]  Uskali Mäki,et al.  On the method of isolation in economics, Idealization IV: Intelligibility in Science, edited by Craig Dilworth , 1992 .

[6]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy , 2014 .

[7]  N. Strachan,et al.  Critical mid-term uncertainties in long-term decarbonisation pathways , 2012 .

[8]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  The Social Dimensions of Energy Transitions , 2013 .

[9]  Nick Obradovich,et al.  Collective responsibility amplifies mitigation behaviors , 2016, Climatic Change.

[10]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions , 2016 .

[11]  T. Foxon A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy , 2011 .

[12]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust , 2014 .

[13]  R. Gillard,et al.  Unravelling the United Kingdom’s climate policy consensus: The power of ideas, discourse and institutions , 2016 .

[14]  Christina Demski,et al.  Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Neil Strachan,et al.  The uncertain but critical role of demand reduction in meeting long-term energy decarbonisation targets , 2014 .

[16]  Malcolm Keay,et al.  UK energy policy – Stuck in ideological limbo? , 2016 .

[17]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[18]  A. Corner,et al.  Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values , 2014 .

[19]  Paul Upham,et al.  Original research articleEnergy model, boundary object and societal lens: 35 years of the MARKAL model in the UK , 2014 .

[20]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  The UK Energy System in 2050: Comparing Low-Carbon, Resilient Scenarios , 2013 .

[21]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[22]  C. Kuzemko Energy Depoliticisation in the UK: Destroying Political Capacity , 2016 .

[23]  Building our Industrial Strategy-Green Paper , January 2017 Response by : The Centre for Economic Performance , London School of Economics , 2022 .

[24]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[25]  S. Rayner Uncomfortable knowledge: the social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses , 2012 .

[26]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Investment appraisal of cost-optimal and near-optimal pathways for the UK electricity sector transition to 2050 , 2017 .

[27]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[28]  Steve Pye,et al.  Achieving net-zero emissions through the reframing of UK national targets in the post-Paris Agreement era , 2017, Nature Energy.

[29]  Emily Cox,et al.  Opening the black box of energy security: A study of conceptions of electricity security in the United Kingdom , 2016 .

[30]  B. Chadwick,et al.  Analysing and presenting qualitative data , 2008, BDJ.

[31]  N. Strachan,et al.  The critical role of the industrial sector in reaching long-term emission reduction, energy efficiency and renewable targets , 2016 .

[32]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  The allure of energy visions: Are some visions better than others? , 2014 .

[33]  B. Sovacool What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[34]  R. Lempert,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis , 2003 .

[35]  Mary C Zwart The Energy Model. , 2016, Midwifery today with international midwife.

[36]  Sarah Baker,et al.  How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research , 2012 .

[37]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  COP21 climate negotiators’ responses to climate model forecasts , 2017 .

[38]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate , 2007, EMBO reports.

[39]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  Publisher Correction: Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions , 2017 .

[40]  David W Chambers,et al.  Errors , 1871, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[41]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: introduction to section 2 , 2010 .

[42]  B. Rockman,et al.  Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews , 2002, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[43]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies , 2001 .

[44]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[45]  Risk , 2020, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[46]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Keep it complex , 2010, Nature.

[47]  M. Mazzucato The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths (an excerpt) , 2015, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[48]  Karen C. Seto,et al.  Beyond Technology: Demand-Side Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation , 2016 .

[49]  Katharina Knoop,et al.  Uncertainty management and the dynamic adjustment of deep decarbonization pathways , 2016 .

[50]  Neil Strachan,et al.  A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models , 2015 .

[51]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[52]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Modelling energy transitions for climate targets under landscape and actor inertia , 2017 .

[53]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Developing dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a computer-assisted approach for developing adaptive strategies for a deeply uncertain world , 2015, Climatic Change.

[54]  A. Stirling On the economics and analysis of diversity , 1998 .

[55]  S. Hove,et al.  Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces , 2014 .

[56]  Francis G.N. Li,et al.  Actors behaving badly: Exploring the modelling of non-optimal behaviour in energy transitions , 2017 .

[57]  P. Stoknes Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox” , 2014 .

[58]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  Errors, Robustness, and the Fourth Quadrant , 2009 .

[59]  J. oliver-solà Prosperity without Growth? – The transition to a sustainable economy , 2010 .

[60]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  UK Energy Policy 1980-2010: A history and lessons to be learnt , 2012 .

[61]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[62]  M. G. Morgan Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Regional winners and losers in future UK energy system transitions , 2016 .

[64]  S. Ruutu,et al.  Prospects of modelling societal transitions : position paper of an emerging community , 2015 .

[65]  B. Wynne Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[66]  J. Farley,et al.  WICKED PROBLEMS , 2007 .

[67]  Marilyn L. Mitchell,et al.  In-Depth Interviews , 2013 .

[68]  M. Lockwood The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK Climate Change Act § , 2013 .

[69]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C , 2016, Nature.

[70]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Uncertainties in decarbonising heat in the UK , 2015 .

[71]  Casey Brown,et al.  Investment Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty -- Application to Climate Change , 2012 .

[72]  Alexander M. Millkey The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2009 .

[73]  M. Lott,et al.  Quantifying the co-impacts of energy sector decarbonisation on outdoor air pollution in the United Kingdom , 2017 .

[74]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[75]  F. Geels,et al.  Ten challenges for computer models in transitions research: Commentary on Holtz et al. , 2017 .

[76]  R. Lempert,et al.  What are robust strategies in the face of uncertain climate threshold responses? , 2012, Climatic Change.

[77]  Sreeja Nair,et al.  Seven tools for creating adaptive policies , 2010 .

[78]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[79]  Steve Pye,et al.  The iterative contribution and relevance of modelling to UK energy policy , 2009 .

[80]  H. Goodman In-Depth Interviews , 2001 .

[81]  B. Li,et al.  Modelling to generate alternatives with an energy system optimization model , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[82]  P. Stern,et al.  Integrating social science in energy research , 2015 .

[83]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world , 2013 .

[84]  Johanna Zmud,et al.  Travel in Britain in 2035: future scenarios and their implications for technology innovation , 2016 .

[85]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Multicriteria diversity analysis: A novel heuristic framework for appraising energy portfolios , 2010 .

[86]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Dynamic adaptive transport policies for handling deep uncertainty , 2010 .

[87]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change , 2016 .

[88]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Reinventing the energy modelling–policy interface , 2016, Nature Energy.

[89]  Dustin Mulvaney,et al.  The political economy of the ‘just transition’ , 2013 .

[90]  A. Rainer The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Myths , 2014 .

[91]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[92]  K. Reinhardt Shaping The Next One Hundred Years New Methods For Quantitative Long Term Policy Analysis , 2016 .

[93]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Dealing With Uncertainty in Policy Analysis and Policymaking , 2003 .

[94]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  Confronting Surprise , 2002 .