Greening and performance relativity: An application in the shipping industry

Shipping activities involve physical movement of cargoes from production to consumption sites. Although shipping operations are beneficial to global trade as well as economic development of countries, the related activities can cause environmental harm, e.g., CO2 emissions and ballast water discharge. As a result, public concerns about the environmental damages caused by shipping activities in servicing international trade are on the rise. To balance environmental protection and business performance improvement, shipping firms should pay more attention to the environmental and financial ramifications of their business routines. This study proposes the concept of Greening and Performance Relativity (GPR) and uses an input-output analytic approach to investigate how greening operations are related to firm performance in shipping operations. We present theory-driven arguments on the link between environmental and financial performance outcomes and empirically validate them with survey data collected from shipping firms. We also examine application of the GPR concept using survey data from the shipping industry in Hong Kong. Our analysis results show that there is a positive association between greening and firm performance in shipping operations. The results also indicate that shipping firms possess reasonably good capability in the business routines of "company policy and procedure", "shipping documentation", "shipping materials", and "shipping design for compliance".

[1]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Do Environmental Management Systems Improve Business Performance in an International Setting? , 2008 .

[2]  Ching-Chiao Yang,et al.  The Effect of Environmental Management on Environmental Performance and Firm Performance in Taiwanese Maritime Firms , 2012 .

[3]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[4]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Inverse scheduling: applications in shipping , 2011 .

[5]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation , 2010 .

[6]  Orestis Schinas,et al.  Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators , 2012 .

[7]  José F. Molina-Azorín,et al.  The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Measures for evaluating green shipping practices implementation , 2013 .

[9]  José Céspedes-Lorente,et al.  Environmental performance and spillover effects on productivity: evidence from horticultural firms. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Kee-hung Lai,et al.  An evaluation of green shipping networks to minimize external cost in the Pearl River Delta region , 2013 .

[11]  Ishtiaq P. Mahmood,et al.  Where can capabilities come from? network ties and capability acquisition in business groups , 2011 .

[12]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Scenario analysis for supply chain integration in container shipping , 2011 .

[13]  Peter Bernard Marlow,et al.  The impact of capacity on firm performance: a study of the liner shipping industry , 2011 .

[14]  Photis M. Panayides,et al.  The effect of ports’ logistics attributes and services on the business and supply chain performance of shipping firms , 2011 .

[15]  Uni Martinsen,et al.  Performance measurements in the greening of supply chains , 2012 .

[16]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[17]  Robert Sroufe,et al.  EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND OPERATIONS , 2003 .

[18]  Erwin Danneels.  Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona , 2011 .

[19]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[20]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[21]  Y. H. Venus Lun,et al.  Green management practices and firm performance : a case of container terminal operations , 2011 .

[22]  Y. Lun,et al.  Fleet mix in container shipping operations , 2009 .

[23]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Shipping design for compliance and the performance contingencies for shipping firms , 2013 .

[24]  J. Krozer,et al.  Demonstration of environmentally sound and cost-effective shipping , 2003 .

[25]  Jean-François Henri,et al.  Environmental performance indicators: an empirical study of Canadian manufacturing firms. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  M. Helms,et al.  Performance measurement for green supply chain management , 2005 .

[27]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Measures for Evaluating Green Shipping Practices , 2016 .

[28]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  A study on the antecedents of supplier commitment in support of logistics operations , 2012 .

[29]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Green shipping practices in the shipping industry : conceptualization, adoption, and implications , 2011 .

[30]  J. Peiró,et al.  Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[32]  Pierre Cariou,et al.  An analytical framework for managing container terminals , 2009 .