Exploring induced pluripotency in human fibroblasts via construction, validation, and application of a gene regulatory network

Reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells, by overexpressing certain factors referred to as the reprogramming factors, can revolutionize regenerative medicine. To provide a coherent description of induced pluripotency from the gene regulation perspective, we use 35 microarray datasets to construct a reprogramming gene regulatory network. Comprising 276 nodes and 4471 links, the resulting network is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest gene regulatory network constructed for human fibroblast reprogramming and it is the only one built using a large number of experimental datasets. To build the network, a model that relates the expression profiles of the initial (fibroblast) and final (induced pluripotent stem cell) states is proposed and the model parameters (link strengths) are fitted using the experimental data. Twenty nine additional experimental datasets are collectively used to test the model/network, and good agreement between experimental and predicted gene expression profiles is found. We show that the model in conjunction with the constructed network can make useful predictions. For example, we demonstrate that our approach can incorporate the effect of reprogramming factor stoichiometry and that its predictions are consistent with the experimentally observed trends in reprogramming efficiency when the stoichiometric ratios vary. Using our model/network, we also suggest new (not used in training of the model) candidate sets of reprogramming factors, many of which have already been experimentally verified. These results suggest our model/network can potentially be used in devising new recipes for induced pluripotency with higher efficiencies. Additionally, we classify the links of the network into three classes of different importance, prioritizing them for experimental verification. We show that many of the links in the top ranked class are experimentally known to be important in reprogramming. Finally, comparing with other methods, we show that using our model is advantageous.

[1]  Rui Chang,et al.  Systematic Search for Recipes to Generate Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  G. Bourque,et al.  Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Sara B. Linker,et al.  KLF4 N-Terminal Variance Modulates Induced Reprogramming to Pluripotency , 2015, Stem cell reports.

[4]  Shulan Tian,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[5]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[6]  Buddhapriya Chakrabarti,et al.  Delayed self-regulation and time-dependent chemical drive leads to novel states in epigenetic landscapes , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  J. Ellis,et al.  Retroviral vector silencing during iPS cell induction: An epigenetic beacon that signals distinct pluripotent states , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[8]  T. Tada,et al.  Sox2 expression effects on direct reprogramming efficiency as determined by alternative somatic cell fate. , 2011, Stem cell research.

[9]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Pluripotency, Differentiation, and Reprogramming: A Gene Expression Dynamics Model with Epigenetic Feedback Regulation , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[11]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.

[12]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Parkinson's Disease Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Viral Reprogramming Factors , 2009, Cell.

[13]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2 , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[15]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  K. Plath,et al.  Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Alexander Meissner,et al.  Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[18]  T. Tuschl,et al.  FOXO1 is an essential regulator of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  Michel Sadelain,et al.  Stoichiometric and temporal requirements of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc expression for efficient human iPSC induction and differentiation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  H. Lehrach,et al.  Analysis of Oct4‐Dependent Transcriptional Networks Regulating Self‐Renewal and Pluripotency in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Stem cells.

[21]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[22]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  A Computational Model for Understanding Stem Cell, Trophectoderm and Endoderm Lineage Determination , 2008, PloS one.

[23]  Bernadett Papp,et al.  Stage-specific regulation of reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells by Wnt signaling and T cell factor proteins. , 2013, Cell reports.

[24]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells From Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2008 .

[25]  Kristi A. Hohenstein,et al.  Regulation of Self‐Renewal and Pluripotency by Sox2 in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Stem cells.

[26]  Jianquan Wang,et al.  Lin28-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of Oct4 expression in human embryonic stem cells , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  Yoshifumi Kawamura,et al.  Direct reprogramming of somatic cells is promoted by maternal transcription factor Glis1 , 2011, Nature.

[28]  I. Sancho-Martinez,et al.  Reprogramming of human fibroblasts to pluripotency with lineage specifiers. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[29]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Stem cell differentiation as a many-body problem , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  H. Ng,et al.  KLF4 and PBX1 Directly Regulate NANOG Expression in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, Stem cells.

[31]  Norio Nakatsuji,et al.  PRDM14 suppresses expression of differentiation marker genes in human embryonic stem cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[32]  Xi Chen,et al.  Zic 3 Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007 .

[33]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  A decade of transcription factor-mediated reprogramming to pluripotency , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  Duren Zhana,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory network for cell reprogramming , 2012, Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference.

[35]  Natalia B. Ivanova,et al.  Distinct lineage specification roles for NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 in human embryonic stem cells. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[36]  N. Nakatsuji,et al.  Role of SOX2 in maintaining pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells , 2010, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[37]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  Zic3 is required for maintenance of pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[38]  C. Verfaillie,et al.  Zic3 enhances the generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2013, Stem cells and development.

[39]  H. Do,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of human Oct4 by steroidogenic factor‐1 , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[40]  Marius Wernig,et al.  A drug-inducible transgenic system for direct reprogramming of multiple somatic cell types , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Trupti Joshi,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory networks from multiple microarray datasets , 2006, Bioinform..

[42]  Jialei Hu,et al.  Reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells by high‐performance engineered factors , 2011, EMBO reports.

[43]  M. Saitou,et al.  PRDM14: a unique regulator for pluripotency and epigenetic reprogramming. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[44]  George Q. Daley,et al.  Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors , 2008, Nature.

[45]  Ariel S. Schwartz,et al.  An Atlas of Combinatorial Transcriptional Regulation in Mouse and Man , 2010, Cell.

[46]  Michael A. Beer,et al.  Lin-28B transactivation is necessary for Myc-mediated let-7 repression and proliferation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  P. Burridge,et al.  MicroRNA‐302 Increases Reprogramming Efficiency via Repression of NR2F2 , 2013, Stem cells.

[48]  L. Hyslop,et al.  Downregulation of NANOG Induces Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells to Extraembryonic Lineages , 2005, Stem cells.

[49]  B. Tidor,et al.  Modeling Stem Cell Induction Processes , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  F. Prósper,et al.  Zic3 induces conversion of human fibroblasts to stable neural progenitor-like cells. , 2012, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[51]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[52]  Guy Karlebach,et al.  Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[53]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Dynamic regulation of human endogenous retroviruses mediates factor-induced reprogramming and differentiation potential , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  C. Chen,et al.  Manipulation of KLF4 Expression Generates iPSCs Paused at Successive Stages of Reprogramming , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[55]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals determinants of human embryonic stem cell identity , 2010, Nature.

[56]  R. Stewart,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[57]  Daniel Marbach,et al.  Tissue-specific regulatory circuits reveal variable modular perturbations across complex diseases , 2016, Nature Methods.

[58]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[59]  Zalmiyah Zakaria,et al.  A review on the computational approaches for gene regulatory network construction , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.