Mid-Range Management Theory: Competence Perspectives on Modularity and Dynamic Capabilities

In this paper we examine some fundamental epistemological issues in building theory for applied management science, by which we mean theory that can be usefully applied in a scientific approach to management research and practice. We first define and distinguish “grand theory” from “midrange theory” in the social and management sciences. We then elaborate and contrast epistemologies for (i) building “grand theory” intended to be applicable to all cases and contexts, and (ii) building “mid-range theory” intended to apply to specific kinds of contexts. We illustrate the epistemological challenges in building grand theory in management science by considering important differences in the abilities of two “grand theories” in strategic management – industry structure theory and firm resources Research in Competence-based Management, volume 8, 1–23 Copyright © 2018 by emerald publishing limited all rights of reproduction in any form reserved issn: 1744-2117/doi:10.1108/s1744-211720170000008001 2 Ron sanChez and aiMé heene theory – to support development of conceptually consistent models and propositions for empirical testing, theoretical refinement, and application in management practice. We then suggest how a mid-range theory building approach can help to achieve integration of the two grand strategic management theories and improve their ability to support empirical testing, theory refinement, and application of theory in practice. Finally, we suggest how the competence-based management (CBM) perspective provides the foundational concepts needed to build both mid-range theory and (potentially) grand theory in strategic management that can be usefully applied in management science.

[1]  D. Hambrick.  An Empirical Typology of Mature Industrial-Product Environments , 1983 .

[2]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[3]  R. Sanchez.  A scientific critique of the resource-base view (RBV) in strategy theory, with competence-based remedies for the RBV's conceptual deficiencies and logic problems , 2008 .

[4]  R. Sanchez.  Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence , 2004 .

[5]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[6]  R. Sanchez.  Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[7]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Grande théorie et théorie intermédiaire en stratégie , 2010 .

[8]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Organization as a Nexus of Rules: Emergence in the Evolution of Systems of Exchange , 2010 .

[9]  Samuel L. Hayes.  Harvard Business School Press series in financial services management , 1992 .

[10]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[11]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Strategic product creation: Managing new interactions of technology, markets, and organizations , 1996 .

[12]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[13]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Dynamics of competence-based competition: Theory and practice in the new strategic management , 1997 .

[14]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[15]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[16]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Architecting Organizations: A Dynamic Strategic Contingency Perspective , 2012 .