Predicting pregnancy rate following multiple embryo transfers using algorithms developed through static image analysis.

Single-embryo image assessment involves a high degree of inaccuracy because of the imprecise labelling of the transferred embryo images. In this study, we considered the entire transfer cycle to predict the implantation potential of embryos, and propose a novel algorithm based on a combination of local binary pattern texture feature and Adaboost classifiers to predict pregnancy rate. The first step of the proposed method was to extract the features of the embryo images using the local binary pattern operator. After this, multiple embryo images in a transfer cycle were considered as one entity, and the pregnancy rate was predicted using three classifiers: the Real Adaboost, Gentle Adaboost, and Modest Adaboost. Finally, the pregnancy rate was determined via the majority vote rule based on classification results of the three Adaboost classifiers. The proposed algorithm was verified to have a good predictive performance and may assist the embryologist and clinician to select embryos to transfer and in turn improve pregnancy rate.

[1]  Yun Tian,et al.  Automatic Blastomere Recognition from a Single Embryo Image , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[2]  Yun Tian,et al.  Classification Based on LBP and SVM for Human Embryo Microscope Images , 2013, HCI.

[3]  Nicholas Costen,et al.  Semiautomated analysis of embryoscope images: Using localized variance of image intensity to detect embryo developmental stages , 2015, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[4]  Michel Camus,et al.  In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Karsten Petersen,et al.  Influence of Zona Pellucida Thickness of Human Embryos on Clinical Pregnancy Outcome Following In Vitro Fertilization Treatment , 2000, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[6]  Loris Nanni,et al.  Artificial intelligence techniques for embryo and oocyte classification. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[7]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[8]  Peter Lorenzen,et al.  Automated Embryo Stage Classification in Time-Lapse Microscopy Video of Early Human Embryo Development , 2013, MICCAI.

[9]  G D Adamson,et al.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. , 2016, Human reproduction.

[10]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Catherine Wong,et al.  Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[12]  P. Kovacs,et al.  Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring , 2014, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[13]  Songying Zhang,et al.  Effect of cumulus cell removal 4 h post-insemination on fertilization and embryo quality: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study , 2013, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[14]  Alice A. Chen,et al.  Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  T. D’Hooghe,et al.  Semi-automated morphometric analysis of human embryos can reveal correlations between total embryo volume and clinical pregnancy. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[16]  Pedro Larrañaga,et al.  Bayesian classification for the selection of in vitro human embryos using morphological and clinical data , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[17]  Carlo Flamigni,et al.  Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential. , 2005, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[18]  C. Farquhar,et al.  Time-lapse in the IVF-lab: how should we assess potential benefit? , 2015, Human reproduction.

[19]  Ronit Machtinger,et al.  Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[20]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers , 2007 .

[21]  Basak Balaban,et al.  Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  Anna Ajduk,et al.  Advances in embryo selection methods , 2012, F1000 biology reports.

[23]  Patrick Bossuyt,et al.  Selection of embryos for transfer in IVF: ranking embryos based on their implantation potential using morphological scoring. , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[24]  Pedro Larrañaga,et al.  Selection of human embryos for transfer by Bayesian classifiers , 2008, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[25]  G. Grimmett,et al.  Probability and random processes , 2002 .

[26]  L. Nieddu,et al.  Pattern recognition methods in human‐assisted reproduction , 2004 .

[27]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study , 2015, Human reproduction.

[28]  R. Saith,et al.  Relationships between the developmental potential of human in-vitro fertilization embryos and features describing the embryo, oocyte and follicle. , 1998, Human reproduction update.

[29]  D. H. Mendez Lozano,et al.  Impact of early cleaved zygote morphology on embryo development and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: a prospective study. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[30]  David K Gardner,et al.  Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[31]  Basak Balaban,et al.  Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. , 2006, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[32]  Jacob F Mayer,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[33]  E. Santos Filho,et al.  A Review on Automatic Analysis of Human Embryo Microscope Images , 2010, The open biomedical engineering journal.