Saliva, breast milk, and serum antibody responses as indirect measures of intestinal immunity after oral cholera vaccination or natural disease

The possibility that antibody responses in serum, saliva, or breast milk samples to oral vaccines or enteric infections may reflect the intestinal immune response was evaluated in Bangladeshi volunteers orally immunized with a cholera B subunit-whole-cell vaccine (B + WCV) and in patients convalescing from enterotoxin-induced diarrheal disease. Two peroral doses of B + WCV induced antitoxin and antibacterial antibody responses in the intestinal fluids of 76 and 92%, respectively, of the volunteers and in serum samples in 90 and 69% of those tested. These responses were comparable to those obtained after cholera or enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli disease. Whereas immunoglobulin A (IgA) antitoxin titer increases in saliva (44%) and breast milk (29%) specimens after vaccination were less frequent than in intestinal fluid (76%), antitoxin responses in saliva and breast milk occurred in 80 to 90% of the patients after disease. Also, antilipopolysaccharide (anti-LPS) titer increases in extraintestinal body fluids were found more frequently after disease than after vaccination. A comparison of the frequency and magnitude of antibody response in different body fluids with those in intestinal lavage fluid revealed no extraintestinal antibody that directly reflected the intestinal immunity. However, comparison of vibriocidal and IgG antitoxin antibodies in serum specimens with antitoxin and anti-LPS IgA responses in intestinal fluids after the vaccination of volunteers showed a sensitivity of 70 to 90% and a predictive accuracy of about 80% for the serum analyses reflecting the intestinal immune responses. Furthermore, antitoxin and anti-LPS antibody responses in saliva and breast milk samples seemed to be useful proxy indicators of a gut mucosal response of these antibodies after enterotoxin-induced diarrheal disease showing sensitivity vales of 70 to 90% and predictive accuracy vales of 70 to 100%.

[1]  B. Stoll,et al.  Local and systemic antibody responses to naturally acquired enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea in an endemic area. , 1986, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  R. Glass,et al.  Seroepidemiological studies of El Tor cholera in Bangladesh: association of serum antibody levels with protection. , 1985, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  D. Sack,et al.  Mucosal antitoxic and antibacterial immunity after cholera disease and after immunization with a combined B subunit-whole cell vaccine. , 1984, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[4]  M. Levine,et al.  New knowledge on pathogenesis of bacterial enteric infections as applied to vaccine development. , 1983, Microbiological reviews.

[5]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Cholera and the immune response. , 1983, Progress in allergy.

[6]  M. Levine,et al.  Serologic differentiation between antitoxin responses to infection with Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. , 1983, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[7]  L. Hanson The mammary gland as an immunological organ. , 1982, Immunology today.

[8]  D. Sack,et al.  INTESTINAL ANTIBODY RESPONSES AFTER IMMUNISATION WITH CHOLERA B SUBUNIT , 1982, The Lancet.

[9]  D. Sack,et al.  Immunobead enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantitating immunoglobulin A in human secretions and serum , 1980, Infection and immunity.

[10]  M. E. Roux,et al.  Organ and isotype distribution of plasma cells producing specific antibody after oral immunization: evidence for a generalized secretory immune system. , 1979, Journal of immunology.

[11]  J. Bienenstock,et al.  Evidence for a common mucosal immunologic system. I. Migration of B immunoblasts into intestinal, respiratory, and genital tissues. , 1979, Journal of immunology.

[12]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Correlation between intestinal synthesis of specific immunoglobulin A and protection against experimental cholera in mice , 1978, Infection and immunity.

[13]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Boosting of Secretory IgA Antibody Responses in Man by Parenteral Cholera Vaccination , 1977, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[14]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Development of improved cholera vaccine based on subunit toxoid , 1977, Nature.

[15]  R. Sack,et al.  Immunity to experimental cholera. III. Enhanced duration of protection after sequential parenteral-oral administration of toxoid to dogs. , 1977, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  J. Sebag,et al.  Decision-making in clinical practice and medical research: a theroretical analysis of predicators, indicators, and health index. , 1974, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[17]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Cholera Serology , 1973, Infection and immunity.

[18]  C. Carpenter,et al.  Antitoxic immunity in experimental canine cholera. , 1970, Transactions of the Association of American Physicians.

[19]  J. Feeley,et al.  PASSIVE SERUM PROTECTION OF THE INFANT RABBIT AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL CHOLERA. , 1964, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  R. Freter Detection of Coproantibody and its Formation after Parenteral and Oral Immunization of Human Volunteers. , 1962 .

[21]  D. Sack,et al.  Local and systemic antibody responses and immunological memory in humans after immunization with cholera B subunit by different routes. , 1984, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[22]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Receptor-specific large-scale purification of cholera toxin on silica beads derivatized with lysoGM1 ganglioside. , 1981, European journal of biochemistry.

[23]  J. Bienenstock,et al.  Mucosal immunology. , 1980, Immunology.

[24]  A. Svennerholm The Nature of Protective Immunity in Cholera1 , 1980 .