Comparison of two dynamic contact line models for driven thin liquid films

The modeling of the motion of a contact line, the triple point at which solid, liquid and air meet, is a major outstanding problem in the fluid mechanics of thin films [2, 9]. In this paper, we compare two well-known models in the specific context of Marangoni driven films. The precursor model replaces the contact line by a sharp transition between the bulk fluid and a thin layer of fluid, effectively pre-wetting the solid; the Navier slip model replaces the usual no-slip boundary condition by a singular slip condition that is effective only very near the contact line. We restrict attention to traveling wave solutions of the thin film PDE for a film driven up an inclined planar solid surface by a thermally induced surface tension gradient. This involves analyzing third order ODE that depend on several parameters. The two models considered here have subtle differences in their description, requiring a careful treatment when comparing traveling waves and effective contact angles. Numerical results exhibit broad agreement between the two models, but the closest comparison can be done only for a rather restricted range of parameters. The driven film context gives contact angle results quite different from the case of a film moving under the action of gravity alone. The numerical technique for exploring phase portraits for the third order ODE is also used to tabulate the kinetic relation and nucleation condition, information that can be used with the underlying hyperbolic conservation law to explain the rich combination of wave structures observed in simulations of the PDE and in experiments [3, 15].

[1]  Andrea L. Bertozzi,et al.  Thin Film Traveling Waves and the Navier Slip Condition , 2003, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[2]  M. Shearer,et al.  Kinetics and nucleation for driven thin film flow , 2005 .

[3]  E. O. Tuck,et al.  A Numerical and Asymptotic Study of Some Third-Order Ordinary Differential Equations Relevant to Draining and Coating Flows , 1990, SIAM Rev..

[4]  L. M. Hocking A moving fluid interface. Part 2. The removal of the force singularity by a slip flow , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Andrea L. Bertozzi,et al.  Existence of Undercompressive Traveling Waves in Thin Film Equations , 2000, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[6]  Kevin Zumbrun,et al.  Stability of compressive and undercompressive thin film travelling waves , 2001, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[7]  L. Scriven,et al.  Hydrodynamic Model of Steady Movement of a Solid / Liquid / Fluid Contact Line , 1971 .

[8]  R. Behringer,et al.  Reverse undercompressive shock structures in driven thin film flow. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  H. P. Greenspan,et al.  On the motion of a small viscous droplet that wets a surface , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Andrea L. Bertozzi,et al.  Undercompressive shocks in thin film flows , 1999 .

[11]  S. Herminghaus,et al.  Wetting: Statics and dynamics , 1997 .

[12]  S. H. Davis,et al.  On the motion of a fluid-fluid interface along a solid surface , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  John E. Buchanan,et al.  Dynamics of thin liquid films in the presence of surface tension gradients , 1973 .

[14]  Philippe G. LeFloch,et al.  Non-classical Riemann solvers with nucleation , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics.

[15]  F. Heslot,et al.  Fingering instability of thin spreading films driven by temperature gradients , 1990, Nature.

[16]  P. LeFloch,et al.  Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws: The Theory of Classical and Nonclassical Shock Waves , 2002 .

[17]  P. Gennes Wetting: statics and dynamics , 1985 .

[18]  Andreas Münch,et al.  Shock transitions in Marangoni gravity-driven thin-film flow , 2000 .

[19]  A. Bertozzi THE MATHEMATICS OF MOVING CONTACT LINES IN THIN LIQUID FILMS , 1998 .

[20]  Thomas P. Witelski,et al.  Blowup and dissipation in a critical-case unstable thin film equation , 2004, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.